Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/56639
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAna Carolina Santospt_BR
dc.creatorLudimila Labancapt_BR
dc.creatorLarissa r Assumpçãopt_BR
dc.creatorPatrícia Cotta Mancinipt_BR
dc.creatorSirley Alves da Silva Carvalhopt_BR
dc.creatorLuciana Macedo Resendept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-18T20:26:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-18T20:26:06Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.citation.volume26pt_BR
dc.citation.issue2pt_BR
dc.citation.spagee250pt_BR
dc.citation.epagee259pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1733928pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1809-9777pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/56639-
dc.description.resumoIntroduction Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) and their suppression may be considered useful in monitoring cochlear function and the efferent auditory pathway inhibitory effect. Nonetheless, the establishment of reliable parameters of response variations is of great importance. Objectives To verify the replicability of test and retest in the research of the inhibitory effect of the efferent pathway using contralateral suppressing stimulus during DPOAE recording for clinical applicability. Methods Cross-sectional study with 48 volunteers, aged 18 to 30 years, with normal audiometric thresholds. The procedures included were audiometric and immittance measures to overrule any conductive or sensorineural conditions and DPOAE recordings without and with contralateral suppression with a 60 dBHL white noise. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitudes were analyzed and compared in both conditions with Wilcoxon test, and the Spearman correlation test was used to assess test-retest reliability. Results The comparative analysis showed differences between amplitudes in test and retest conditions only in 1,500 Hz for DPOAE measures with all other tested frequencies showing no differences ,and no difference was observed in all recorded frequencies in the test and retest comparison for DPOAE suppression. The degree of correlation between test and retest of DPOAE amplitude was good at 6,000 Hz and strong (r > 0.880) at the other frequencies. For DPOAE with suppression, all frequencies presented strong correlation between test and retest: 1,500 Hz (r ¼ 0.880), 2,000 Hz (r ¼ 0.882), 3,000 Hz (r ¼ 0.940), and 6,000 Hz (r ¼ 0.957). Conclusions The study found good replicability in contralateral suppression of DPOAE with potential clinical applicability, and we recommend conducting the test from 2000Hz to higher frequencies for more reliable results.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE FONOAUDIOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE OFTALMOLOGIA E OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectCochlear hair cellspt_BR
dc.subjectAuditory efferent pathwaypt_BR
dc.subjectReproducibility of resultspt_BR
dc.subjectHearing losspt_BR
dc.subjectYoung adultpt_BR
dc.subjectNoise effectspt_BR
dc.subject.otherAdulto Jovempt_BR
dc.subject.otherEfeitos do Ruídopt_BR
dc.subject.otherPerda Auditivapt_BR
dc.subject.otherReprodutibilidade dos Testespt_BR
dc.subject.otherCélulas Ciliadas Auditivaspt_BR
dc.titleReliability of contralateral suppression in evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissionspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0041-1733928pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2142-0827pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3296-4800pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0701-3897pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6535-1413pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3705-9471pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-2692pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.