1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/56674
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRicardo Reisdinardipt_BR
dc.creatorCarlos Henrique Santos Ferreirapt_BR
dc.creatorGiordani Santos Silveirapt_BR
dc.creatorVânia Eloisa de Araújo Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorCássio da Cunha Ibiapinapt_BR
dc.creatorCláudia Ribeiro de Andradept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-18T22:14:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-18T22:14:47Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-18-
dc.citation.volume1pt_BR
dc.citation.issue278pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1307pt_BR
dc.citation.epage1320pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-020-06202-5pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn09374477pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/56674-
dc.description.resumoBackground Numerous studies have shown that the external nasal dilator (END) increases the cross sectional area of the nasal valve, thereby reducing nasal resistance, transnasal inspiratory pressure, stabilizing the lateral nasal vestibule, and preventing its collapse during fnal inhalation.Objectives Our objective was to carry out a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the efects of the END during physical exercise.Methods After selecting articles in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases, 624 studies were identifed. However, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 articles were considered eligible for review.Results Those studies included in the meta-analysis, the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max.) outcome was assessed in 168 participants in which no statistically signifcant diference was found, MD (95% CI)=0.86 [−0.43, 2.15], p=0.19, and I2=0%. The heart rate (HR) outcome was assessed in 138 participants in which no statistically signifcant diference was found, MD (95% CI)=0.02 [−3.19, 3.22], p=0.99, and I2=0%. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) outcome was assessed in 92 participants in which no statistically signifcant diference was found, MD (95% CI)= −0.12 [−0.52, 0.28], p=0.56, and I2=27%. Conclusions The external nasal dilator strip showed no improvement in VO2max., HR and RPE outcomes in healthy individuals during exercise.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE PEDIATRIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectExternal nasal dilatorpt_BR
dc.subjectNasal valvept_BR
dc.subjectNasal resistancept_BR
dc.subjectPhysical exercisept_BR
dc.subjectPerfomancept_BR
dc.subject.otherAtividade físicapt_BR
dc.subject.otherPerfomancept_BR
dc.titleDoes the external nasal dilator strip help in sports activity? A systematic review and meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06202-5pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Does the external nasal dilator strip help in sports activity A systematic review and meta-analysis pdfa.pdf981.12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.