1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/57274
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorAna Maria de Araújo Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorAna Cristina Dias de Paivapt_BR
dc.creatorDebora Balabrampt_BR
dc.creatorGilvane Naves Marcondes Goulartpt_BR
dc.creatorLarissa Oliveira de Aquinopt_BR
dc.creatorMayne Cardoso Canipt_BR
dc.creatorThais Vilela de Pinho Andradept_BR
dc.creatorCarolina Patricia Mendes Rutkowskpt_BR
dc.creatorLeandro Goncalves Alves Ramospt_BR
dc.creatorJuliana Silva Barrapt_BR
dc.creatorEliza Maria de Freitas Rangept_BR
dc.creatorKelly Cristina Reispt_BR
dc.creatorAna Silvia Diniz Maklufpt_BR
dc.creatorSoraia Martins de Araujopt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Oliveira Barrapt_BR
dc.creatorPriscilla Duraes Bicalhopt_BR
dc.creatorAloma de Fatima Campos Moricipt_BR
dc.creatorAnnamaria Massahud Rodrigues Dos Santospt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T21:30:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-31T21:30:59Z-
dc.date.issued2013-06-04-
dc.citation.volume108pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage2442pt_BR
dc.citation.epage2447pt_BR
dc.identifier.doidoi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.267pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn25741241pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/57274-
dc.description.resumoBackground: A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach to breast cancer management is the gold standard. The aim is to evaluate MDT decision making in a modern breast unit.Methods: All referrals to the breast MDT where breast cancer was diagnosed from 1 July 2009 to 30 June 2011 were included.Multidisciplinary team decisions were compared with subsequent patient management and classified as concordant or discordant.Results: Over the study period, there were 3230 MDT decisions relating to 705 patients. Overall, 91.5% (2956 out of 3230) of decisions were concordant, 4.5% (146 out of 3230), were discordant and 4% (128 out of 3230) had no MDT decision. Of 146 discordant decisions, 26 (17.8%) were considered ‘unjustifiable’ as there was no additional information available after the MDT to account for the change in management. The remaining 120 discordant MDT decisions were considered ‘justifiable’, as management was altered due to patient choice (n ¼ 61), additional information available after MDT (n ¼ 54) or MDT error (n ¼ 5). Conclusion: The vast majority of MDT decisions are implemented. Management alteration was most often due to patient choice or additional information available after the MDT. A minority of management alterations were ‘unjustifiable’ and the authors recommend that any patient whose treatment is subsequently changed should have MDT rediscussion prior to treatment.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE GINECOLOGIA OBSTETRÍCIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Cancer-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectBreast cancerpt_BR
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary teampt_BR
dc.subject.otherNeoplasias Inflamatórias Mamáriaspt_BR
dc.subject.otherEquipe de Assistência ao Pacientept_BR
dc.titleMultidisciplinary approach in breast cancerpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.nature.com/articles/bjc2013267pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Multidisciplinary decisions in breast cancer pdfa.pdf101.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.