Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/57284
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Tinglei | pt_BR |
dc.creator | hu Qian | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Long Hua | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Guilherme Moreira de Abreu e Silva | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Yihe hu | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Pengfei Lei | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-31T23:15:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-07-31T23:15:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 141 | pt_BR |
dc.citation.spage | 783 | pt_BR |
dc.citation.epage | 793 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00402-020-03481-9 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 09368051 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/57284 | - |
dc.description.resumo | Introduction The aim of this study is to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing the benefits and clinical outcomes between high flexion (HF)-TKA and standard (S)-TKA.Materials and methods A detailed database analysis was carried out using Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Clinicaltrial.gov, to identify eligible studies. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were per formed using Review Manager 5.3 software and STATA 12.0.Results Twenty-two randomized control trials (RCTs), including 2841 patients and 4268 knees, were eligible for the metaanalysis. The pooled results of subgroup analysis reveal that there was significant difference between HF-TKA and S-TKA in each subgroup in terms of postoperative ROM, with a higher degree of knee flexion for HF-TKA than S-TKA. However, no statistical difference was identified between HF-TKA and S-TKA in other clinical outcomes including various functional scores and complications.Conclusions On the basis of this meta-analysis, we can recommended HF-TKA as an alternative choice to S-TKA for patients requiring higher knee flexion in their daily activitie. | pt_BR |
dc.format.mimetype | pt_BR | |
dc.language | eng | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.country | Brasil | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.department | MED - DEPARTAMENTO DE APARELHO LOCOMOTOR | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.department | MED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIAL | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.initials | UFMG | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | - |
dc.rights | Acesso Restrito | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Meta-analysis | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Total knee arthroplasty | pt_BR |
dc.subject | High flexion | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Randomized controlled trials | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Range of motion | pt_BR |
dc.subject.other | Metanálise | pt_BR |
dc.subject.other | Artroplastia do Joelho | pt_BR |
dc.subject.other | Randomized controlled trials | pt_BR |
dc.subject.other | Amplitude de Movimento Articular | pt_BR |
dc.title | Is high flexion total knee arthroplasty a rewarding procedure? an updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de Periódico | pt_BR |
dc.url.externa | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-020-03481-9 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3869-8606 | pt_BR |
Appears in Collections: | Artigo de Periódico |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.