Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59050
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMarina Amaral de Ávila Machadopt_BR
dc.creatorFelipe Ferrépt_BR
dc.creatorCristiano Soares de Mourapt_BR
dc.creatorAlessandra Maciel Almeidapt_BR
dc.creatorEli Iola Gurgel Andradept_BR
dc.creatorMariangela Leal Cherchigliapt_BR
dc.creatorFrancisco de Assis Acurciopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-02T15:39:34Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-02T15:39:34Z-
dc.date.issued2016-12-
dc.citation.volume3pt_BR
dc.citation.issue2pt_BR
dc.citation.spage353pt_BR
dc.citation.epage361pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-016-0036-0pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2198-6584pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/59050-
dc.description.abstractIntrodução: O Sistema Único de Saúde brasileiro oferece tratamento medicamentoso gratuito para espondilite anquilosante (EA) a todos os cidadãos brasileiros. Relatamos aqui o primeiro estudo de coorte de base populacional em pacientes com EA no Brasil. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os custos dos bloqueadores do fator de necrose tumoral (anti-TNF) e dos medicamentos antirreumáticos modificadores da doença (DMARDs) utilizados no tratamento de pacientes com EA no Brasil entre março de 2010 e setembro de 2013. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo de coorte retrospectivo utilizando bases de dados administrativas. Todos os pacientes com diagnóstico de EA com idade igual ou superior a 18 anos e que receberam anti-TNF ou DMARD foram incluídos na análise. A análise de custos foi realizada sob a perspectiva do sistema de saúde e os resultados foram descritos como custo mediano mensal per capita e custo anual durante o período do estudo. Resultados: Uma busca nas bases de dados identificou 1.251 pacientes com EA que foram tratados durante o período do estudo, dos quais 63,3% eram do sexo masculino; a idade média era de 41 anos. No período do estudo, 78,0% dos pacientes iniciaram tratamento com anti-TNF e 22,0% com DMARD. O custo médio mensal per capita foi de US$ 1.650 para terapia anti-TNF e US$ 25 para tratamento com DMARDs. Entre os medicamentos anti-TNF, a terapia com etanercepte foi associada ao menor custo por paciente, seguida de adalimumabe e infliximabe. Não foi observada diferença no custo mensal em relação ao sexo e idade. Conclusão: O custo por paciente do tratamento de EA nesta coorte de estudo foi menor com etanercepte do que com adalimumabe e infliximabe. Estes resultados destacam o fardo económico do tratamento de pacientes com EA.pt_BR
dc.description.resumoIntroduction: The Brazilian Public Health System offers free-of-charge drug treatment for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to all Brazilian citizens. We report here the first population-based cohort study on patients with AS in Brazil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the costs of the tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) blockers and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) that were used in the treatments of patients with AS in Brazil between March 2010 and September 2013. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using administrative databases. All patients with a diagnosis of AS who were aged 18 years or older and had been dispensed anti-TNF or DMARDs were included in the analysis. The cost analysis was carried out from the health system perspective, and the results were described as median monthly cost per capita and the annual cost over the study period. Results: A search of the databases identified 1251 patients with AS who were treated during the study period, of whom 63.3% were male; the median age was 41 years. During the study period, 78.0% of patients initiated treatment with anti-TNF drugs and 22.0% with DMARDs. The median monthly cost per capita was US$ 1650 for anti-TNF therapy and US$ 25 for treatment with DMARDs. Among the anti-TNF drugs, therapy with etanercept was associated with the lowest cost per patient, followed by adalimumab and infliximab. No difference in monthly cost was observed in relation to gender and age. Conclusion: The cost per patient of treating AS in this study cohort was lower with etanercept than with adalimumab and infliximab. These results highlights the economic burden of treating patients with AS.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAR - DEPARTAMENTO DE FARMÁCIA SOCIALpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE MEDICINA PREVENTIVA SOCIALpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRheumatology and Therapy-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAdministrative claims datapt_BR
dc.subjectAnkylosing spondylitispt_BR
dc.subjectAnti-TNF therapypt_BR
dc.subjectDMARDspt_BR
dc.subjectDrug costpt_BR
dc.subject.otherEspondilite anquilosantept_BR
dc.subject.otherInibidores do fator de necrose tumoralpt_BR
dc.subject.otherAntirreumáticospt_BR
dc.subject.otherCustos de medicamentospt_BR
dc.titleCosts of drug therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40744-016-0036-0pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Costs of drug therapy in patients with ankylosing spondylitis in Brazil.pdf453.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.