1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/59290
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCaio Nerypt_BR
dc.creatorDaniel Soares Baumfeldpt_BR
dc.creatorTiago Baumfeldpt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Pradopt_BR
dc.creatorEric Gizapt_BR
dc.creatorPablo Wagnerpt_BR
dc.creatorEmilio Wagnerpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-09T19:57:56Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-09T19:57:56Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.citation.volume41pt_BR
dc.citation.issue16pt_BR
dc.citation.spage735pt_BR
dc.citation.epage743pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1071100720907878pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn10711007pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/59290-
dc.description.resumoBackground: Lisfranc injuries represent a spectrum of trauma from high-energy lesions, with significant instability of the midfoot, to low-energy lesions, with subtle subluxations or instability without gross displacement. Recently, treatment options that allow for physiologic fixation of this multiplanar joint are being evaluated. The purpose of this study was to analyze the stability of a cadaveric Lisfranc injury model fixed with a novel suture-augmented neoligamentplasty in comparison with a traditional transarticular screw fixation construct. Methods: Twenty-four fresh-frozen, matched cadaveric leg and foot specimens (12 individuals younger than 65 years of age) were used for this study. Two different types of Lisfranc ligament injuries were tested: partial and complete. Two different methods of fixation were compared: transarticular screws and augmented suture ligamentplasty with FiberTape. Specimens were fixed to a rotation platform in order to stress the joints while applying 400 N of axial load and internal and external rotation. Six distances were measured and compared between the intact, injured, and fixed states with a 3D Digitizer arm, in order to evaluate the stability between them. Analysis of variance was used with P < .05 considered significant. Results: Using distribution graphs and analyzing the grouped data, it was observed that there was no difference between the 2 stabilization methods, but the augmented suture ligamentplasty presented lower variability and observed distance shortenings were more likely to be around the mean. The variability of the stabilization with screws was 2.9 times higher than that with tape (P < .001).Conclusion: We suggest that augmented suture ligamentplasty can achieve similar stability to classic transarticular screws, with less variability. Clinical Relevance: This cadaveric study adds new information on the debate about Lisfranc lesions treatment. Flexible fixations, such as the synthethic ligamentplasty used, can restore good stability such as conventional transarticular screws.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE APARELHO LOCOMOTORpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofFoot & Ankle International-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectLisfrancpt_BR
dc.subjectLigamentplastypt_BR
dc.subjectTransarticular screwspt_BR
dc.subjectFiber Tapept_BR
dc.subject.otherJoint Instabilitypt_BR
dc.subject.otherAnklept_BR
dc.titleComparison of suture-augmented ligamentplasty to transarticular screws in a lisfranc cadaveric modelpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071100720907878pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.