Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60604
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorGibson Moreira Praçapt_BR
dc.creatorMauro Heleno Chagaspt_BR
dc.creatorSarah da Glória Teles Bredtpt_BR
dc.creatorAndré Gustavo Pereira de Andradept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-07T20:50:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-07T20:50:39Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.citation.volume81pt_BR
dc.citation.spage163pt_BR
dc.citation.epage176pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0013pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1640-5544pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/60604-
dc.description.resumoThis study aimed to systematically review the influence of the relative area on athletes’ physical and physiological responses (outcomes) during small-sided games of soccer which were not matched to the relative area. It also presents a meta-analysis comparing standard small-sided games protocols with different relative areas. We searched the Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases for literature published up to March 2020 following all PRISMA guidelines for selecting articles for a qualitative and quantitative synthesis. As a result, eleven articles matched the inclusion criteria. For the quantitative synthesis, a pooled random-effects model was used to make pairwise comparisons between protocols with larger or smaller areas in each selected study. Prediction intervals were used to assess the heterogeneity. We found positive effects of larger relative areas per player on their total distance (d = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.12–1.34; p = 0.006; medium to large effect), distance covered at high speed (d = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.22–1.65; p = 0.001; large effect), and mean heart rate (d = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.17–0.88; p = 0.008; medium effect). In other words, larger relative areas were found to induce higher physical and physiological responses in players. Future studies should consider the relative area per player when comparing data for different small-sided games configurations to avoid confounding variables. Also, coaches can use relative area per player calculations to easily predict increases and decreases in expected training loads for different versions of SSGs during training.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESPORTESpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentEEFFTO - ESCOLA DE EDUCAÇÃO FISICA, FISIOTERAPIA E TERAPIA OCUPACIONALpt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Human Kineticspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectSoccerpt_BR
dc.subjectSmall-sided gamespt_BR
dc.subjectGPSpt_BR
dc.subjectRelative area per playerpt_BR
dc.subjectPhysical responsept_BR
dc.subjectPhysiological responsept_BR
dc.subject.otherFutebolpt_BR
dc.subject.otherEstresse fisiológicopt_BR
dc.subject.otherSistema de Posicionamento Globalpt_BR
dc.titleSmall-Sided Soccer Games with Larger Relative Areas Result in Higher Physical and Physiological Responses: A Systematic and Meta-Analytical Reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://jhk.termedia.pl/Small-Sided-Soccer-Games-with-Larger-Relative-Areas-Result-in-Higher-Physical-and,158678,0,2.htmlpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.