1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60721
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorHugo André da Rochapt_BR
dc.creatorAlaneir de Fátima Dos Santospt_BR
dc.creatorIlka Afonso Reispt_BR
dc.creatorMarcos Antônio da Cunha Santospt_BR
dc.creatorMariângela Leal Cherchigliapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-09T19:30:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-09T19:30:20Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.citation.volume52pt_BR
dc.citation.issue17pt_BR
dc.citation.spage1pt_BR
dc.citation.epage11pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000051pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn15188787pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/60721-
dc.description.resumoOBJECTIVE: To determine the items of the Brazilian National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care that better evaluate the capacity to provide mental health care.METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study carried out using the Graded Response Model of the Item Response Theory using secondary data from the second cycle of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care, which evaluates 30,523 primary care teams in the period from 2013 to 2014 in Brazil. The internal consistency, correlation between items, and correlation between items and the total score were tested using the Cronbach’s alpha, Spearman’s correlation, and point biserial coefficients, respectively. The assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence of the items were tested. Word clouds were used as one way to present the results.RESULTS: The items with the greatest ability to discriminate were scheduling of the agenda according to risk stratification, keeping of records of the most serious cases of users in psychological distress, and provision of group care. The items that required a higher level of mental health care in the parameter of location were the provision of any type of group care and the provision of educational and mental health promotion activities. Total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.87. The items that obtained the highest correlation with total score were the recording of the most serious cases of users in psychological distress and scheduling of the agenda according to risk stratification. The final scores obtained oscillated between -2.07(minimum) and 1.95 (maximum).CONCLUSIONS: There are important aspects in the discrimination of the capacity to provide mental health care by primary health care teams: risk stratification for care management, follow-up of the most serious cases, group care, and preventive and health promotion actions.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentICX - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTATÍSTICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Saúde Pública-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectMental Health Services Mental Health Services, organization & administrationpt_BR
dc.subjectPrimary Health Carept_BR
dc.subjectPatients, classificationpt_BR
dc.subjectHealth Services Researchpt_BR
dc.subject.otherMental Health Servicespt_BR
dc.subject.otherPrimary Health Carept_BR
dc.subject.otherHealth Services Researchpt_BR
dc.titleMental health in primary care: an evaluation using the item response theorypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052000051pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Mental health in primary care pdfa.pdf228.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.