Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60795
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Daniella Reismartelli | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Maria Christina Lopes Oliveira | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Sérgio Veloso Brant Pinheiro | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Maria Luiza Santos | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Veronica Dias | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Ana Cristina Simões e Silva | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Hercílio Martelli-júnior | pt_BR |
dc.creator | Eduardo Araujo Oliveira | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-10T20:16:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-10T20:16:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 65 | pt_BR |
dc.citation.issue | 5 | pt_BR |
dc.citation.spage | 682 | pt_BR |
dc.citation.epage | 690 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.682 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 18069282 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/60795 | - |
dc.description.resumo | BACKGROUND. This study aimed to evaluate the scientific production of researchers in the field of Medicine who receive a productivity grant from the CNPq. METHODS: The curriculum Lattes of 542 researchers with active grants from 2012 to 2014 were included in the analysis. Grants categories/levels were stratified into three groups according to the CNPq database (1A-B, 1C-D, and 2). RESULTS. There was a predominance of grants in category 2. During their academic career, Medicine researchers published 76512 articles, with a median of 119 articles per researcher (IQ, interquartile range, 77 to 174). Among the 76512 articles, 36584 (47.8%) were indexed in the Web of Science (WoS database). Researchers in Medicine were cited 643159 times in the WoS database, with a median of 754 citations (IQ, 356 to 1447). There were significant differences among the categories of grants concerning the number of citations in WoS (P <0.001). There was a significant difference in the number of times researchers were cited according to the specialty included in Medicine area. (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION. Strategies to improve the scientific output qualitatively possibly can be enhanced by the knowledge of the profile of researchers in the field of Medicine. | pt_BR |
dc.format.mimetype | pt_BR | |
dc.language | eng | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.country | Brasil | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.department | MED - DEPARTAMENTO DE PEDIATRIA | pt_BR |
dc.publisher.initials | UFMG | pt_BR |
dc.relation.ispartof | Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira | - |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Research Personnel | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Work Performance | pt_BR |
dc.subject.other | Research Personnel | pt_BR |
dc.subject.other | Work Performance | pt_BR |
dc.title | Profile and scientific output of researchers recipients of cnpq productivity grant in the field of medicine | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo de Periódico | pt_BR |
dc.url.externa | https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.682 | pt_BR |
Appears in Collections: | Artigo de Periódico |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Profile and scientific output of researchers pdfa.pdf | 187.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.