1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/61756
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCarla Isabelly Rodriguespt_BR
dc.creatorFelipe Paiva Fonsecapt_BR
dc.creatorAlan Roger dos Santos-Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorPaul Speightpt_BR
dc.creatorSyed Ali Khurrampt_BR
dc.creatorAnna Luíza Damaceno Araújopt_BR
dc.creatorDanyel Elias da Cruz Perezpt_BR
dc.creatorMárcio Ajudarte Lopespt_BR
dc.creatorOslei Paes de Almeidapt_BR
dc.creatorPablo Agustin Vargaspt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T20:44:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-05T20:44:51Z-
dc.date.issued2020-08-24-
dc.citation.volume477pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage475pt_BR
dc.citation.epage486pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02908-3pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn09456317pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/61756-
dc.description.resumoSince digital microscopy (DM) has become a useful alternative to conventional light microscopy (CLM), several approaches have been used to evaluate students' performance and perception. This systematic review aimed to integrate data regarding the use of DM for education in human pathology, determining whether this technology can be an adequate learning tool, and an appropriate method to evaluate students' performance. Following a specific search strategy and eligibility criteria, three electronic databases were searched and several articles were screened. Eight studies involving medical and dental students were included. The test of performance comprised diagnostic and microscopic description, clinical features, differential, and final diagnoses of the specimens. The students' achievements were equivalent, similar or higher using DM in comparison with CLM in four studies. All publications employed question surveys to assess the students' perceptions, especially regarding the easiness of equipment use, quality of images, and preference for one method. Seven studies (87.5%) indicated the students' support of DM as an appropriate method for learning. The quality assessment categorized most studies as having a low bias risk (75%). This study presents the efficacy of DM for human pathology education, although the high heterogeneity of the included articles did not permit outlining a specific method of performance evaluation.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofVirchows Archivpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectVirchows archiv nome periódicopt_BR
dc.subjectdia busca 24 do 10 2023 fao clinica The use of digital microscopy as a teaching method for human pathology: a systematic review assunto education patologia em ingles acesso restritopt_BR
dc.subject.otherEducationpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPathologypt_BR
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviewpt_BR
dc.titleThe use of digital microscopy as a teaching method for human pathology: a systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00428-020-02908-3pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.