1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/61829
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMarcelo Esteves Chavescampospt_BR
dc.creatorMarcelo Magaldi Ribeiro de Oliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorLilian Bambirra de Assispt_BR
dc.creatorAugusto Barbosa Reispt_BR
dc.creatorFlávio Bambirra Gonçalvespt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-07T00:01:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-07T00:01:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.citation.volume66pt_BR
dc.citation.issue3pt_BR
dc.citation.spage328pt_BR
dc.citation.epage333pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/1806-9282.66.3.328pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn01044230pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/61829-
dc.description.resumoBACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) tool into Brazilian Portuguese and to determine its reproducibility and validity in Brasil.METHODS: A Brazilian Portuguese version of OSATS was created through a process of translation, back-translation, expert panel evaluation, pilot testing, and then its validation. For the construct and the concurrent validities, twelve participants were divided into a group of six experts and six novices, who had to perform tasks on a simulation model using human placentas. Each participant was filmed, and two blinded raters would then evaluate their performance using the traditional subjective method and then the Brazilian Portuguese version of OSATS. RESULTS: The Brazilian Portuguese version of OSATS had the face, content, construct, and concurrent validities achieved. The average experts’ score and standard deviations were 34 and 0.894, respectively, for Judge 1 and 34.33 and 0.816 for Judge 2. In the case of novices, it was 13.33 and 2.388 for Judge 1 and 13.33 and 3.204 for Judge 2. The concordance between the judges was evident, with the Correla tion Coefficient (Pearson) of 0.9944 with CI 95% between 0.9797 and 0.9985, with p < 10-10, evidencing the excellent reproducibility of the instrument.CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that the Brazilian Portuguese version of OSATS can reliably and validly assess surgical skills in Brasil.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentICX - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESTATÍSTICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIRURGIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofRevista da Associação Médica Brasileira-
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectEducational Measurementpt_BR
dc.subjectSurgical Procedurespt_BR
dc.subjectSimulationpt_BR
dc.subjectTrainingpt_BR
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairespt_BR
dc.subject.otherSimulation Exercisept_BR
dc.subject.otherSimulation Trainingpt_BR
dc.subject.otherEducational Measurementpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurgical Procedures, Operativept_BR
dc.subject.otherSurveys and Questionnairespt_BR
dc.titleValidation of the objective structured assessment of technical skill in brasilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.66.3.328pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Validation of the Objective Structured pdfa.pdf154.04 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.