Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/61843
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorKaline Gomes Ferrari Marquatpt_BR
dc.creatorThe P5 Working Grouppt_BR
dc.creatorMário Dias Corrêa Júniorpt_BR
dc.creatorThais Valeria Silvapt_BR
dc.creatorBen W. Molpt_BR
dc.creatorJosé Guilherme Cecattipt_BR
dc.creatorRenato Passini Jr.pt_BR
dc.creatorCynara Maria Pereirapt_BR
dc.creatorThaisa Guedes Bortolettopt_BR
dc.creatorTatiana F. Fantonpt_BR
dc.creatorRodolfo C. Pacagnellapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-07T21:26:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-07T21:26:25Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-07-
dc.citation.volume17pt_BR
dc.citation.issue10pt_BR
dc.citation.spagee0272128pt_BR
dc.citation.epage16pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272128pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/61843-
dc.description.resumoObjective Since there are populational differences and risk factors that influence the cervical length, the aim of the study was to construct a populational curve with measurements of the uterine cervix of pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy and to evaluate which variables were related to cervical length (CL) ≤25 mm. Materials and methods This was a multicenter cross-sectional study performed at 17 hospitals in several regions of Brazil. From 2015 to 2019, transvaginal ultrasound scan was performed in women with singleton pregnancies at 18 0/7 to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation to measure the CL. We analyzed CL regarding its distribution and the risk factors for CL ≤25 mm using logistic regression. Results The percentage of CL ≤ 25mm was 6.67%. Shorter cervices, when measured using both straight and curve techniques, showed similar results: range 21.0–25.0 mm in straight versus 22.6–26.0 mm in curve measurement for the 5th percentile. However, the difference between the two techniques became more pronounced after the 75th percentile (range 41.0–42.0 mm straight x 43.6–45.0 mm in curve measurement). The risk factors identified for short cervix were low body mass index (BMI) (OR: 1.81 CI: 1.16–2.82), higher education (OR: 1.39 CI: 1.10–1.75) and personal history ([one prior miscarriage OR: 1.41 CI: 1.11–1.78 and ≥2 prior miscarriages OR: 1.67 CI: 1.24–2.25], preterm birth [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.12–2.59], previous low birth weight <2500 g [OR: 1.70 CI: 1.15–2.50], cervical surgery [OR: 4.33 CI: 2.58–7.27]). By contrast, obesity (OR: 0.64 CI: 0.51–0.82), living with a partner (OR: 0.76 CI: 0.61–0.95) and previous pregnancy (OR: 0.46 CI: 0.37–0.57) decreased the risk of short cervix. Conclusions The CL distribution showed a relatively low percentage of cervix ≤25 mm. There may be populational differences in the CL distribution and this as well as the risk factors for short CL need to be considered when adopting a screening strategy for short cervix.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológicopt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE GINECOLOGIA OBSTETRÍCIApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentMEDICINA - FACULDADE DE MEDICINApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONEpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectGravidezpt_BR
dc.subjectFatores de riscopt_BR
dc.subjectEstudos Transversaispt_BR
dc.subject.otherGravidezpt_BR
dc.subject.otherFatores de riscopt_BR
dc.subject.otherEstudos Transversaispt_BR
dc.titleCervical length distribution among Brazilian pregnant population and risk factors for short cervix: A multicenter cross-sectional studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0272128#:~:text=The%20distribution%20showed%20a%20low,g%20and%20prior%20cervical%20surgery.pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8718-5372pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-0009pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.