1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/63284
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRafael Alvim Magestypt_BR
dc.creatorEndi Lanza Galvãopt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorCássio Roberto Rocha dos Santospt_BR
dc.creatorSaulo Gabriel Moreira Falcipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T17:24:14Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-24T17:24:14Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.citation.volume16pt_BR
dc.citation.issue1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage13pt_BR
dc.citation.epage21pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-016-0938-ypt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0974-942Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/63284-
dc.description.resumoAim: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare, in the lower third molar surgery, the osteotomy techniques with rotary instruments and piezoelectric motors. Methods: An electronic search was conducted using the following databases: Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register. Inclusion criteria were: studies in humans, randomized or nonrandomized, comparing the extraction of third molars that required osteotomy and/or odontosection with rotary instrument and osteotomy and/or odontosection with piezoelectric motor assistance. The analysis and inclusion of articles was performed by two reviewers independently. An evaluation of the quality of articles and data extraction was carried out. Results: From a total of nine hundred seventy four (974) trials, eleven articles were included in the qualitative analysis, and seven were included in the quantitative analysis. Rotary instruments were faster than the piezoelectric surgery (95 % CI 0.34 to 1.16). The piezoelectric surgery showed better results when compared with roatry instruments when trismus was assessed in 2 (95 % CI 0.65 to 1.69), 3 (95 % CI 0.63 to 1.67) and 5 (95 % CI 0.03 to 2.26) days after surgery. Seven days after surgery, there were no differences between the techniques (95 % CI (−0.022) to (−1.49)). Conclusion: The piezoelectric surgery was effective in reducing pain, swelling and trismus in third molar surgery, but the same requires greater surgical time than the rotary instruments.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectThird molarpt_BR
dc.subjectOral surgerypt_BR
dc.subjectPiezoeletric surgerypt_BR
dc.subject.otherMolar, thirdpt_BR
dc.subject.otherSurgery, oralpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPiezosurgerypt_BR
dc.titleRotary instrument or piezoelectric for the removal of third molars: a meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12663-016-0938-ypt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.