1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/65682
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorErika Silva Pantuzzopt_BR
dc.creatorFabiano Araújo Cunhapt_BR
dc.creatorLucas Guimarães Abreupt_BR
dc.creatorRafael Paschoal Esteves Limapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T21:57:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T21:57:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-04-
dc.citation.volume24pt_BR
dc.citation.issue3pt_BR
dc.citation.spage259pt_BR
dc.citation.epage263pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjisp.jisp_478_19pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0975-1580pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/65682-
dc.description.resumoAbstract: Background: This randomized single‑blinded clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of diode laser and fluoride in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) due to gingival recession. Materials and Methods: Twenty‑eight individuals randomly distributed across three groups participated: 10 individuals who were treated with diode laser, nine who were treated with fluoride, and nine who received placebo. Pain was assessed with the Visual analog scale (VAS). Evaporative stimulus and tactile stimulus were evaluated with the verbal rating scale (VRS). VAS was applied shortly after, 6 h after, 12 h after, and 24 h after the single‑session treatment for DH, whereas VRS was applied shortly after, 15 min and 7 days after the treatment. Participants’ quality of life was assessed with the validated Brazilian version of the Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire assessing functional limitations, coping behaviors, emotional, and social impacts caused by DH. Descriptive statistics and the ANOVA test were used. Values of P < 0.05 were statistically significant. Results: Diode laser significantly reduced the DH to the evaporative stimulus (P = 0.002). The application of fluoride did not change the degree of DH to evaporative and tactile stimuli (P > 0.05). The group of individuals who were treated with diode laser presented a higher reduction in DH (25.4%) when compared to the group of individuals treated with fluoride (17.1%), and the group of individuals among whom placebo had been used (2.9%). Descriptive analysis indicated that the items measuring the emotional and social impacts of DH were those with a more negative impact on the individuals. Conclusion: Therapy with diode laser was more effective in reducing DH than therapy with fluoride.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of indian society of periodontologypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectJournal of indian society of periodontologypt_BR
dc.subject.otherFluorinept_BR
dc.subject.otherLaserspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDentin Sensitivitypt_BR
dc.subject.otherQuality of lifept_BR
dc.subject.otherPainpt_BR
dc.titleEffectiveness of diode laser and fluoride on dentin hypersensitivity treatment: a randomized single blinded clinical trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://journals.lww.com/jisp/toc/2020/24030pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidspt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Effectiveness of diode laser and fluoride on dentin hypersensitivity treatment a randomized single-blinded clinical trial.pdf483.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.