1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/66980
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorNathalia Calzavara Del Lhanopt_BR
dc.creatorRosangela Almeida Ribeiropt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorNeuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assispt_BR
dc.creatorKarina Lopes Devitopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-09T19:14:20Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-09T19:14:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-
dc.citation.volume49pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage20190265pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190265pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1476-542Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/66980-
dc.description.resumoObjectives: The aim of this systematic review was to verify whether CBCT in comparison with panoramic radiography reduced the cases of temporary paresthesias of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) associated with third molar extractions. Methods: The literature search included five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, SciELO), in addition to gray literature and hand search of reference list of included studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts, and full texts according to eligibility criteria, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias through Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2.0). Data were meta-analyzed by comparing CBCT versus panoramic radiographs for number of events (temporary paresthesia after third molar surgery). Fixed effect model was used for non-significant heterogeneity; relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were calculated. The certainty of evidence was evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in meta-analysis, and for the majority of domains they presented low risk of bias. RR was 1.23 (95% IC: 0.75–2.02; I2: 0%; p = 0.43) favouring panoramic radiography, but without significant effect, and with moderate certainty of evidence. Conclusions: We concluded that both interventions had a similar ability to reduce temporary paresthesia of the IAN after third molar surgery with moderate certainty of evidence.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiology-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectParesthesiapt_BR
dc.subjectInferior alveolar nervept_BR
dc.subjectThird molarpt_BR
dc.subjectCBCTpt_BR
dc.subjectPanoramic radiographypt_BR
dc.subject.otherParesthesiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherMandibular nervept_BR
dc.subject.otherMolar, thirdpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCone-beam computed tomographypt_BR
dc.subject.otherRadiography, panoramicpt_BR
dc.titlePanoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://academic.oup.com/dmfr/article/49/4/20190265/7262829pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.