1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/67969
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorJéssica Melopt_BR
dc.creatorJossaria Sousapt_BR
dc.creatorRamon Firminopt_BR
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martinspt_BR
dc.creatorAna Flávia Granville-Garciapt_BR
dc.creatorCassiano Nonakapt_BR
dc.creatorEdja Costapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-30T18:09:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-30T18:09:09Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.citation.volume56pt_BR
dc.citation.issue3pt_BR
dc.citation.spage443pt_BR
dc.citation.epage453pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12871pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1600-0765pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/67969-
dc.description.resumoBackground: Scaling and root planning (SRP) is the gold standard for non-surgical periodontal treatment. Green tea as a supporting alternative in non-surgical periodontal treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic option in the treatment of periodontitis. Objective: To analyse the comparative effectiveness of green tea (Camellia sinensis) in its different forms and applications for the treatment of periodontitis. Methods: We included randomized clinical trials evaluating green tea as an adjuvant therapeutic agent to scaling and root planning (SRP) in the treatment of periodontitis. For the meta-analysis, we calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95%CI comparing green tea and control (only SRP). We subgrouped by types of application forms of green tea. The certainty of the evidence was assessed through GRADE. Results: Nine studies were included. The follow-up time of treatments varied from 21 days to 6 months. The subgroup meta-analysis showed that the green tea as sachet reduced probing bleeding (SMD = −0.71; 95%CI) and the gingival index (SMD = −0.78; 95%CI) compared to SRP with very low certainty of evidence. The sa-chet (SMD = −0.29; 95%CI) and dentifrice (SMD = −1.31; 95%CI) reduced plaque index with very low certainty compared to the control. All forms of application of green tea showed very low certainty of evidence (SMD = −0.27; 95% CI) in reducing the prob-ing depth, as well as for the loss of clinical insertion (SMD = −0.42; 95% CI) with low certainty of evidence.Conclusion: There was not a difference in the effectiveness of green tea isolated or in combination with SRP to reduce probing depth. Green tea adjunct to periodontal therapy showed very low certainty of effectiveness for the treatment of periodontal disease.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorpt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipOutra Agênciapt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Periodontal Research-
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectCatechinpt_BR
dc.subjectEpigallocatechin-3-gallatept_BR
dc.subjectNon-surgical periodontal debridementpt_BR
dc.subjectPeriodontal diseasespt_BR
dc.subject.otherCatechinpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPeriodontal debridementpt_BR
dc.subject.otherPeriodontal diseasespt_BR
dc.subject.otherTeapt_BR
dc.titleDifferent applications forms of green tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze) for the treatment of periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jre.12871pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.