1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/70772
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMaria Luiza Lima Santanapt_BR
dc.creatorAna Isis Cesáriopt_BR
dc.creatorDanilo Rocha Diaspt_BR
dc.creatorEdgar Dutra Zanottopt_BR
dc.creatorOscar Peitl Filhopt_BR
dc.creatorCarlos Estrelapt_BR
dc.creatorVirgílio Moreira Rorizpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-16T16:00:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-16T16:00:03Z-
dc.date.issued2022-04-
dc.citation.volume16pt_BR
dc.citation.issue4pt_BR
dc.citation.spage51pt_BR
dc.citation.epage54pt_BR
dc.identifier.doi10.7860/JCDR/2022/52874.16269pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2249-782Xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/70772-
dc.description.resumoIntroduction: Dentin Hypersensitivity (DH) is known to be a relatively common condition that affects a considerable portion of the population, and manifests itself in the form of acute pain, due to the exposure of dentin and open dentinal tubules, after the removal of enamel or root cement. It has a multifactorial aetiology. Aim: To compare the efficacy in DH treatment using Biosilicate and Gluma Desensitiser. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical trial pilot study with a split-mouth design included seven participants. Two teeth presenting Gingival Recession (GR)-related DH were selected in each participant and allocated to treatment groups by simple randomisation. Gluma® desensitiser (GD) and Biosilicate® (BIO) were applied once a week for four weeks. The pain intensity under a volatile stimulus was measured using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline and after treatment, at 15 days and 6 months follow-up. Data analysis were performed by means of descriptive statistics, Paired t-test for inter-group comparison and Friedman test for intra-group comparison (p-value <0.05). Results: The mean age of seven participants were 19.9 years, from which five were women (71.4%). The GD and BIO groups presented initial mean VAS values of 4.86±2.55 and 6.14±1.57, respectively. Fifteen days after treatment, both groups showed a significant improvement (GD group p-value=0.03 and BIO group p-value=0.02, Wilcoxon test) in pain intensity, with 71.4% teeth without sensitivity (VAS=0). Conclusion: Both treatments resulted in a reduction in painful sensitivity under volatile stimuli 15 days after treatment. BIO group presented a better outcome regarding reduction in DH, without recurrence at the 6th month evaluation, when compared to GD group.pt_BR
dc.format.mimetypepdfpt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Researchpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectDentin hypersensitivitypt_BR
dc.subjectTreatmentpt_BR
dc.subjectDentin desensitizing agentspt_BR
dc.subject.otherOdontologiapt_BR
dc.subject.otherSensibilidade da Dentinapt_BR
dc.subject.otherMedição da Dorpt_BR
dc.subject.otherDessensibilizantes Dentináriospt_BR
dc.titleEfficacy of biosilicate glass-ceramic and gluma in the treatment of cervical dentin hypersensitivity: an interim results of randomised control trialpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://jcdr.net/article_abstract.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2022&volume=16&issue=4&page=ZC51&issn=0973-709x&id=16269pt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Efficacy of Biosilicate Glass-Ceramic and Gluma in the Treatment of Cervical Dentin Hypersensitivity- An Interim Results of Randomised Control Trial.pdf311.54 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.