1. Repositório Institucional da UFMG
  2. Publicações Científicas e Culturais
  3. Artigo de Periódico
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/70954
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorFariapt_BR
dc.creatorLeandro Napier de Souzapt_BR
dc.creatorPachecopt_BR
dc.creatorOliveirapt_BR
dc.creatorNeivapt_BR
dc.creatorPolianne Alves Mendes Nascimentopt_BR
dc.creatorMeirapt_BR
dc.creatorFerreirapt_BR
dc.creatorSouzapt_BR
dc.creatorRicardo Alves Mesquitapt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T17:47:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-18T17:47:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-05-
dc.citation.volume48pt_BR
dc.citation.issueSupplement 1pt_BR
dc.citation.spage225pt_BR
dc.citation.epage225pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.692pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/70954-
dc.description.resumoBackground: Management of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) remains a clinical challenge. Many treatment options are described, but each case should be treated individually, depending on clinical manifestations as well as patient's medical condition. Sequestrectomy and primary closure are usually employed, but surgical resections could be necessary. Pedicled buccal fat pad (PBFP) has been proposed to aid in soft tissue covering and healing, especially in posterior maxillary cases. However, free buccal fat pat (FBFP) use in MRONJ treatment has not been described. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of pedicled and free buccal fat pad (BFP) in MRONJ treatment. Methods: This study was previously approved by local ethical committee. Thirteen MRONJ patients were treated – 8 under osteoporosis treatment (Group 1) and five undergoing malignant neoplasm therapy (Group 2). All patients were submitted to sequestrectomy and primary closure using BFP. In Group 1, five patients were treated by means of PBFP and three with FBFP. In Group 2, four patients were treated with PBFP and one with FBFP. All PBFP treatment were in posterior maxillary region whereas FBFP were in mandible. Findings: All cases achieved complete healing after 8 weeks of follow-up. PBFP had a higher volume maintenance in the treated sites comparing to FBFP. Conclusion: The use of BFP in MRONJ treatment looks promising in both groups. Despite its apparent postoperative success in both forms, future prospective studies with a larger number of patients are necessary to prove these results.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgerypt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Restritopt_BR
dc.subjectInternational journal of oral & maxillofacial surgerypt_BR
dc.subjectacesso restrito Use of pedicled and free buccal fat pad in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw treatment fao clínica dia 16/07/2024 16 e 23 a horapt_BR
dc.subject.otherFatpt_BR
dc.subject.otherMouthpt_BR
dc.subject.otherEvaluation studypt_BR
dc.subject.otherTherapeuticspt_BR
dc.subject.otherPathologypt_BR
dc.titleUse of pedicled and free buccal fat pad in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw treatmentpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.ijoms.com/article/S0901-5027(19)30798-2/fulltextpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.