Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/75861
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLucas Lenyn Vieira Chavespt_BR
dc.creatorLucas Lopes Rosadopt_BR
dc.creatorSaulo Machado Piccolopt_BR
dc.creatorLiana Matos Ferreirapt_BR
dc.creatorKivanç Kamburoglupt_BR
dc.creatorRafael Binato Junqueirapt_BR
dc.creatorMaurício Augusto Aquino de Castropt_BR
dc.creatorFrancielle Silestre Vernerpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-30T21:10:50Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-30T21:10:50Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-15-
dc.citation.volume12pt_BR
dc.citation.issue12pt_BR
dc.citation.spage3169pt_BR
dc.citation.epageDiagnostics assunto Cone-Beam Computed Tomographypt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12123169pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/75861-
dc.description.resumoBackground: During oral rehabilitation, dental implants in the posterior maxilla can penetrate the maxillary sinus. The aim was to evaluate the presence of maxillary sinus abnormalities in patients with dental implants in the posterior maxillary region using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, and CBCT scans of 199 patients (459 dental implants) were evaluated. Implants were assessed according to their relative location to the maxillary sinus floor (up to 2 mm from the maxillary sinus cortex, within 2 mm to intimate contact with the maxillary sinus cortex, apical third inside the maxillary sinus, two-thirds or more inside the maxillary sinus) and bone-fixation tissue (Alveolar ridge or Bone graft). Maxillary sinus abnormalities were classified. Kappa and Weighted Kappa and the Kruskal–Wallis test were applied. Results: A higher prevalence of mucosal thickening and non-specific opacification were observed in implants located within 2 mm to intimate contact with the cortex of the maxillary sinus floor. Of the 66 implants with apical thirds located inside the maxillary sinus, 31 (46.7%) were associated with sinus abnormalities and of all implants (n = 5) with two-thirds or more located inside the maxillary sinus, all of these were associated with sinus abnormalities. No association was observed in relation to implant bone-fixation tissue. Conclusions: This study found a significant association between dental implant placement near or within the sinus and sinus abnormalities, mainly mucosal thickening and non-specific opacification.pt_BR
dc.languageengpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Geraispt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICApt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUFMGpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnosticspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectCone beam computed tomographypt_BR
dc.subjectMaxillary sinuspt_BR
dc.subjectImplantpt_BR
dc.subject.otherCone-beam computed tomographypt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental implantspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDental implantspt_BR
dc.subject.otherDiagnostic imagingpt_BR
dc.subject.othermaxillary sinuspt_BR
dc.subject.otherMaxillary sinuspt_BR
dc.subject.otherMaxillary sinusitispt_BR
dc.subject.otherEvaluation studypt_BR
dc.subject.otherMaxillofacial abnormalitiespt_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of the maxillary sinus of patients with maxillary posterior implants: a CBCT cross-sectional studypt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
dc.url.externahttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/12/3169pt_BR
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-376Xpt_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódico



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.