Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1843/78433| Type: | Artigo de Periódico |
| Title: | Beyond the hype: a critical appraisal of the limitations and misconceptions of systematic reviews in the oral pathology and medicine field |
| Authors: | Nathália Sernizon Guimarães Peter Brennan Ricardo Santiago Gomez Roberta Rayra Martins Chaves |
| Abstract: | Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) have become a popular approach for evidence-based practice, being considered a lens through which evidence is viewed and applied. However, several published studies have been identified as scoping reviews rather than SRs. This methodological error can negatively impact clinical decision-making or new research conceptualization. Aim: This letter focuses on the increasing number of SRs in oral pathology and medicine, highlighting the most frequent methodological mistakes. Results: We providing general guidance to help researchers conceptualize better their SRs and for the critical evaluation of SRs by scientific journal reviewers. Conclusion: Clinicians, pathologists, and reviewers, must ensure the quality of the published information. |
| Subject: | Oral medicine Pathology, oral Peer review Review Systematic review Methodology as a subject |
| language: | eng |
| metadata.dc.publisher.country: | Brasil |
| Publisher: | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais |
| Publisher Initials: | UFMG |
| metadata.dc.publisher.department: | FAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA |
| Rights: | Acesso Restrito |
| metadata.dc.identifier.doi: | https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.13456 |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/78433 |
| Issue Date: | 2023 |
| metadata.dc.url.externa: | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.13456 |
| metadata.dc.relation.ispartof: | Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine |
| Appears in Collections: | Artigo de Periódico |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.