Validation of a scale to assess patients’ comprehension of frequently used cardiology terminology: the cardiac TERM scale in brazilian portuguese

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorGabriela Lima de Melo Ghisi
dc.creatorRafaella Zulianello Dos Santos
dc.creatorRaquel Rodrigues Britto
dc.creatorChristiani Decker Batista Bonin
dc.creatorThaianne Cavalcante Servio
dc.creatorLuiz Fernando Schmidt
dc.creatorMagnus Benetti
dc.creatorSherry Grace
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T18:33:32Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:59:54Z
dc.date.available2022-07-08T18:33:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/rnj.0000000000000099
dc.identifier.issn2048-7940
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/43084
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofRehabilitation Nursing
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectReabilitação cardíaca
dc.subjectCompreensão
dc.subjectTerminologia
dc.subject.otherCardiac rehabilitation
dc.subject.otherComprehension
dc.subject.otherTterminology
dc.titleValidation of a scale to assess patients’ comprehension of frequently used cardiology terminology: the cardiac TERM scale in brazilian portuguese
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage95
local.citation.issue2
local.citation.spage87
local.citation.volume44
local.description.resumoPurpose: The aim of this study was to psychometrically validate the translation of a questionnaire on patient understanding of cardiology terminology (TERM) to Brazilian Portuguese. Design: After piloting the translation and cross-cultural adaptation, the 16-item TERM questionnaire was psychometrically tested. Methods: Internal and test–retest reliability, as well as validity, were assessed in 322 cardiac patients. Findings: Internal (α = .88) and test–retest reliability (all weighted Kappa > 0.63) exceeded the minimum recommended standards. Criterion validity was supported by significant differences in mean scores by socioeconomic indicators (p < .01). Discriminant validity was supported in that cardiac rehabilitation participants had significantly higher TERM scores (p < .001). Participants did not correctly define any of the terms, and a floor effect was identified in all terms. Conclusions: The Cardiac TERM Scale was demonstrated to have good reliability and validity. Clinical Relevance: The scale can be used by healthcare professionals, such as nurses. Results can be used to inform patient education, which could in turn impact patient adherence to medical advice and hence outcomes.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7946-3718
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6239-8179
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9533-3654
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-0079-255X
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-7063-3610
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://journals.lww.com/rehabnursingjournal/Abstract/2019/03000/Validation_of_a_Scale_to_Assess_Patients_.4.aspx

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG