Does the external nasal dilator strip help in sports activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorRicardo Reisdinardi
dc.creatorCarlos Henrique Santos Ferreira
dc.creatorGiordani Santos Silveira
dc.creatorVânia Eloisa de Araújo Silva
dc.creatorCássio da Cunha Ibiapina
dc.creatorCláudia Ribeiro de Andrade
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-18T22:14:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:22:56Z
dc.date.available2023-07-18T22:14:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-18
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00405-020-06202-5
dc.identifier.issn09374477
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/56674
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectAtividade física
dc.subjectPerfomance
dc.subject.otherExternal nasal dilator
dc.subject.otherNasal valve
dc.subject.otherNasal resistance
dc.subject.otherPhysical exercise
dc.subject.otherPerfomance
dc.titleDoes the external nasal dilator strip help in sports activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage1320
local.citation.issue278
local.citation.spage1307
local.citation.volume1
local.description.resumoBackground Numerous studies have shown that the external nasal dilator (END) increases the cross sectional area of the nasal valve, thereby reducing nasal resistance, transnasal inspiratory pressure, stabilizing the lateral nasal vestibule, and preventing its collapse during fnal inhalation.Objectives Our objective was to carry out a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis on the efects of the END during physical exercise.Methods After selecting articles in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases, 624 studies were identifed. However, after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 19 articles were considered eligible for review.Results Those studies included in the meta-analysis, the maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max.) outcome was assessed in 168 participants in which no statistically signifcant diference was found, MD (95% CI)=0.86 [−0.43, 2.15], p=0.19, and I2=0%. The heart rate (HR) outcome was assessed in 138 participants in which no statistically signifcant diference was found, MD (95% CI)=0.02 [−3.19, 3.22], p=0.99, and I2=0%. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) outcome was assessed in 92 participants in which no statistically signifcant diference was found, MD (95% CI)= −0.12 [−0.52, 0.28], p=0.56, and I2=27%. Conclusions The external nasal dilator strip showed no improvement in VO2max., HR and RPE outcomes in healthy individuals during exercise.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE PEDIATRIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06202-5

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Does the external nasal dilator strip help in sports activity A systematic review and meta-analysis pdfa.pdf
Tamanho:
981.12 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG