Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorKarina Maria Salvatore de Freitas
dc.creatorRenata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira
dc.creatorRicardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira
dc.creatorAdenilson Silva Chagas
dc.creatorFabricio Pinelli Valarelli
dc.creatorRodrigo Hermont Cançado
dc.creatorLuiz Filiphe Gonçalves Canuto
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T16:23:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:05:15Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T16:23:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-22
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.2319/031319-197.1
dc.identifier.issn00033219
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/50703
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontist
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectPost and core technique
dc.subjectMandible
dc.subjectMaxilla
dc.subject.otherOrthodontics
dc.subject.otherOrthodontic retainers
dc.subject.otherRetention
dc.titleLevel of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage68
local.citation.issue1
local.citation.spage63
local.citation.volume90
local.description.resumoObjective To compare the level of satisfaction in the use of wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers. Materials and Methods The study sample included 70 orthodontic patients (24 males and 46 females), who were in the retention stage (mean age = 20.80 years). All patients wore the two types of maxillary retainer for 1 month each, along with a 3×3 fixed mandibular retainer. After the use of each retainer, the patients responded to a questionnaire evaluating the level of satisfaction with their use of the maxillary retainer. Intergroup comparison was performed by independent t tests. Chi-square test was used to evaluate preference for the type of retainer by gender. Results The thermoplastic retainer was better for swallowing and the wraparound Hawley appliance was better for hygiene and durability. The other factors evaluated (adaptation, speech, comfort, esthetics, satisfaction, and fitting) did not show significant differences between the retainers. There was also no significant difference in preference for the appliances. Conclusions Regarding the overall satisfaction and the preference, there was no difference between the wraparound Hawley and thermoplastic retainers. The wraparound Hawley appliance was better in hygiene and resistance than the thermoplastic retainer; and the thermoplastic appliance was better than the wraparound Hawley for swallowing fluids and saliva.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://meridian.allenpress.com/angle-orthodontist/article/90/1/63/423103/Level-of-Satisfaction-in-the-Use-of-the-Wraparound

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Level of satisfaction in the use of the wraparound hawley and thermoplastic maxillary retainers.pdf
Tamanho:
188.29 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG