Current evidence does not support whole body vibration in clinical practice in children and adolescents with disabilities: a systematic review of randomized controlled trial

dc.creatorHércules Ribeiro Leite
dc.creatorAna Cristina Resende Camargos
dc.creatorVanessa Amaral Mendonça
dc.creatorAna Cristina Rodrigues Lacerda
dc.creatorBruno Alvarenga Soares
dc.creatorVinicius Cunha Oliveira
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-13T16:37:01Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:23:04Z
dc.date.available2022-07-13T16:37:01Z
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.09.005
dc.identifier.issn1413-3555
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/43240
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectCrianças deficientes
dc.subjectAdolescentes
dc.subjectDeficiência física
dc.subjectVibração
dc.subjectReabilitação
dc.subjectExercícios físicos
dc.subjectRevisão sistemática
dc.subject.otherChildren
dc.subject.otherAdolescent
dc.subject.otherDisability
dc.subject.otherWhole body vibration
dc.subject.otherExercise
dc.titleCurrent evidence does not support whole body vibration in clinical practice in children and adolescents with disabilities: a systematic review of randomized controlled trial
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage211
local.citation.issue3
local.citation.spage196
local.citation.volume23
local.description.resumoBackground: Whole body vibration has been used alone or combined with other interventions in rehabilitation of children and adolescents with disabilities; however, there is limited evidence to support this approach. Objectives: To review the strength, quality, and conclusiveness of evidence supporting the use of whole body vibration in children and adolescents with disabilities. Methods: Electronic database search included Medline, AMED, Embase, Cochrane, SportDiscus, CINAHL and PEDro from the inception to June 2018. Studies investigating the effects of whole body vibration, alone or combined with other interventions, compared to minimal intervention or other interventions were included. The outcomes measured were: body structure and function (lean body mass, bone mineral density, knee muscle strength and overall stability) and activity and participation (gait speed, walking distance, gross motor function, self-care and mobility). Results: Fifteen randomized trials involving 403 participants were included. Methodological quality of eligible trials was moderate (mean of 5.5 points on the 10-point PEDro scale). Overall, whole body vibration was no better than minimal intervention. In all comparisons where additional effect of whole body vibration was better than other interventions, the effect size ranged from low to high in the trials, but ranged from very-low to low quality at short and medium-term follow-up. Sensitivity analysis for health condition and low-quality studies showed impact on trunk bone mineral density of additional effect of whole body vibration at medium-term compared to other interventions. Conclusion: The low to very-low quality of evidence suggests caution in recommending the use of this approach. New studies could change the findings of this review. PROSPERO registration: CRD42017060704.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-8131
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0003-2719-4231
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-1696-6091
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-5366-3754
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-1709-3747
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-8658-3774
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413355518300236?via%3Dihub

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: