Oral health issues in children and adolescents with vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorLuiza Costa Silva Freire
dc.creatorMariana Oliveira Guimarães
dc.creatorLucas Guimarães Abreu
dc.creatorFabiana Vargas Ferreira
dc.creatorRaquel Gonçalves Vieira de Andrade
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-04T15:40:20Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:05:39Z
dc.date.available2025-06-04T15:40:20Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12967
dc.identifier.issn1365-263X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/82784
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Paediatric Dentistry
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectOral health
dc.subjectDental care for persons with disabilities
dc.subjectDental care for children
dc.subjectTooth injuries
dc.subjectVision disorders
dc.subject.otherAdolescent
dc.subject.otherBlindness
dc.subject.otherChild
dc.subject.otherDental care of disabled
dc.subject.otherOral health
dc.subject.otherTraumatic dental injuries
dc.subject.otherVisual impairment
dc.titleOral health issues in children and adolescents with vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage893
local.citation.issue6
local.citation.spage877
local.citation.volume32
local.description.resumoBackground: Children and adolescents with vision impairment (VI) may be atincreased risk of oral health issues, such as periodontal inflammation, poor oral hygiene, dental caries, and dental trauma, but this is inconclusive in the literature. Aim: To systematically review the literature to determine the main oral health issues of children and adolescents with VI compared to those without VI. Design: Electronic and manual searches were performed to identify observational studies involving children and adolescents with and without VI, to determine and compare their oral health issues. The methodological quality wasassessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Studies that had homogeneity of methods were incorporated into meta-analyses. Results: Fifteen cross-sectional studies were included. Overall, most studies presented methodological flaws and high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed that children and adolescents with VI were 3.86 times as likely to exhibit dental trauma (OR = 3.86, 95% CI = 2.63–5.68, I2 = 0%) and had higher/poorer valuesfor plaque (MD = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.58–1.02, I 2 = 96%), gingivitis (MD = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.02–1.37, I 2 = 100%), calculus (MD = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.03–0.06, I 2 = 0%), andoral hygiene indices (MD = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.24–1.18, I 2 = 97%), as well as DMFS(MD = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.68–1.13, I2 = 26%). Conclusion: Across a wide array of assessments, children and adolescents with vision impairment had worse oral health outcomes than those without VI.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6039-4633
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-7216
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA SOCIAL E PREVENTIVA
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ipd.12967

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG