Mandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorNogueira
dc.creatorDanilo Rocha Dias
dc.creatorCláudio Rodrigues Leles
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T18:18:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:14:13Z
dc.date.available2022-09-24T18:18:55Z
dc.date.issued2017-08-14
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/joor.12550
dc.identifier.issn0305182X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/45453
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectDenture complete
dc.subjectPatient satisfaction
dc.subjectPatient reported outcome measures
dc.subject.otherComplete denture
dc.subject.otherOverdenture
dc.subject.otherPatient satisfaction
dc.subject.otherPatient-reported outcomes
dc.subject.otherQuality of life
dc.subject.otherSystematic review
dc.titleMandibular complete denture versus single-implant overdenture: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage1016
local.citation.issue12
local.citation.spage1004
local.citation.volume44
local.description.resumoThe single-implant mandibular overdenture (SIMO) has been proposed as an alternative for edentulous patients who are poorly adapted to their dentures due to low retention and stability of the conventional mandibular complete denture (CD). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effectiveness of SIMO, which can be measured by examining patient perception of treatment effects. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the comparative results of CD and SIMO treatments using patient-reported outcome measures. A literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane Central databases. The search included studies published up to July 2017. The focus question was: 'Do single-implant mandibular overdentures improve patient-reported outcomes compared to conventional complete dentures in edentulous patients?' Eligible studies were randomised clinical trials (RCT) and prospective studies. After initial screening for eligibility and full-text analysis, 11 studies were included for data extraction and quality assessment (five parallel-group RCTs, two crossover RCTs and four prospective studies). All studies reported marked improvement in satisfaction with the dentures and quality of life measures after SIMO treatment, irrespective of variations in implant treatment protocols and retention systems. Methodological considerations revealed a lack of evidence from RCTs on the comparative effectiveness of the two treatment strategies. Hence, although available evidence suggests considerable improvement in patient-reported outcomes following the insertion of a single implant to retain a mandibular denture, further well-designed comparative studies between SIMO and CD are required to improve the level of evidence and to support the indication of SIMO treatment in routine practice
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.12550

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG