Comparison of different multivariate classification methods for the detection of adulterations in grape nectars by using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance

Descrição

Tipo

Artigo de periódico

Título alternativo

Primeiro orientador

Membros da banca

Resumo

Grape is the most consumed nectar in Brazil and a relatively expensive beverage. Therefore, it is susceptible to fraud by substitution with other less expensive fruit juices. Adulterations of grape nectars by the addition of apple juice, cashew juice, and mixtures of both were evaluated by using low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LF-NMR) and supervised multivariate classification methods. Two different approaches were investigated using one-class (only unadulterated samples (UN) were modeled) and multiclass (three classes were modeled: UN, adulterated with cashew (CAS), and adulterated with apple (APP)) strategies. For the one-class approach, soft independent modeling of class analogy (SIMCA), one-class partial least squares (OCPLS), and data-driven SIMCA (DD-SIMCA) models were built. For the multiclass approach, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and multiclass SIMCA models were built. The results obtained demonstrated good performances by all the one-class methods with efficiency rates higher than 93%. For the multiclass approach, the classification of samples containing only one type of adulterant presented efficiencies higher than 90% and 97% using SIMCA and PLS-DA, respectively. The classification of samples containing blends of two adulterants was satisfactory for the CAS class, but not for the APP class when applying PLS-DA. Nevertheless, multiclass SIMCA did not provide satisfactory predictions for either of these two classes.

Abstract

Assunto

Tecnologia de alimentos, Uva, Alteração em néctar de uva, Ressonância magnética nuclear de baixo campo, Néctar de fruta

Palavras-chave

Time-domain NMR, TD-NMR, One-class modeling, Discriminant analysis, Fruit nectar, Food adulteration

Citação

Curso

Endereço externo

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12161-019-01522-7

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por