Self-rated health after stroke: a systematic review of the literature

dc.creatorÉrika de Freitas Araújo
dc.creatorRamon Távora Viana
dc.creatorLuci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela
dc.creatorLidiane Andrea Oliveira Lima
dc.creatorChristina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-27T14:19:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:09:28Z
dc.date.available2022-04-27T14:19:28Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description.sponsorshipCNPq - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
dc.description.sponsorshipCAPES - Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186%2Fs12883-019-1448-6
dc.identifier.issn1471-2377
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/41168
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Neurology
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectPolítica de saúde
dc.subjectServiços de saúde
dc.subjectAcidente vascular cerebral
dc.subjectDoenças cerebelares
dc.subjectAutoavaliação
dc.subject.otherSelf-rated health
dc.subject.otherPerceived health
dc.subject.otherSelf-assessment
dc.subject.otherHealth status
dc.subject.otherStroke
dc.subject.otherCerebrovascular disorders
dc.subject.otherReview
dc.titleSelf-rated health after stroke: a systematic review of the literature
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage14
local.citation.issue221
local.citation.spage1
local.citation.volume19
local.description.resumoBackground: Self-rated health (SRH) allows for comparison and identification of the health status of various populations. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to expand the understanding of SRH after stroke. Methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017056194) and conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published until December 2018 that evaluated the SRH of adults with stroke were included. Results: Of the 2132 identified studies, 51 were included. Only four studies had experimental designs (7.8%). In 60.7% of the studies, SRH was assessed by variations on direct questions (i.e., general and comparative SRH). Analog visual scales and quality of life instruments were also used to evaluate SRH, but there is no consensus regarding whether they are appropriate for this purpose. The results of cross-sectional and longitudinal studies revealed significant associations between poor SRH and stroke as well as between SRH, function, and disability. The power of SRH to predict stroke mortality is still uncertain. Two interventions (a home-based psychoeducational program concerning stroke health care and family involvement in functional rehabilitation) effectively improved SRH. Conclusions: Direct questions are the most common method of evaluating SRH after stroke. Studies reported significant associations between the SRH of individuals with stroke and several relevant health outcomes. However, few experimental studies have evaluated SRH after stroke. Interventions involving health education and family involvement had a significant impact on SRH.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-3542-1070
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-8358-8636
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0001-8959-8894
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9729
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731602/

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Self rated health after stroke.pdf
Tamanho:
933.45 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: