Disparities in breast, lung, and cervical cancer trials worldwide

dc.creatorRamya Ramaswami
dc.creatorEduardo Paulino
dc.creatorAdriana Barrichello
dc.creatorAngélica Nogueira Rodrigues
dc.creatorAlexandra Bukowski
dc.creatorJessica St. Louis
dc.creatorPaul e. Goss
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-11T20:32:11Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:16:41Z
dc.date.available2023-08-11T20:32:11Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1200/JGO.17.00226
dc.identifier.issn2378-9506
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/57767
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Global Oncology
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectNeoplasias da Mama
dc.subjectNeoplasias Pulmonares
dc.subjectNeoplasias do Colo do Útero
dc.subject.otherBreast Cancer
dc.subject.otherCervical Cancer
dc.subject.otherLung Cancer
dc.titleDisparities in breast, lung, and cervical cancer trials worldwide
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage11
local.citation.issue4
local.citation.spage1
local.citation.volume1
local.description.resumoPurpose As cancer burden has risen worldwide, physicians, patients, and their advocates have become aware that the clinical cancer trial research paradigm is not ubiquitous. Furthermore, the number and characteristics of trials that are registered in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with that in high-income countries (HICs) are unknown.Methods We collected retrospective data on trials for breast, lung, and cervical cancer registered in ClinicalTrials.gov or with the WHO International Clinical Trial Registry Platform between 2010 and 2017. The data were then classified as trials within LMICs or HICs using definitions from the World Bank.Results Included in these analyses were 6,710 trials, of which 3,164 (47%) were breast cancer trials, 3,283 (49%) were lung cancer trials, and 263 (4%) were cervical cancer trials. There were 1,951 (29%) trials from LMICs and 4,759 (71%) trials from HICs (P < .001). Although the proportion of phase III trials in HICs versus LMICs was similar (18% v 17%; P = .66), the number of phase I trials in LMICs was significantly lower than that of HICs (20% v 2%; P < .001). For several LMICs with the highest mortality-to-incidence ratios for breast, lung, or cervical cancer, there were no cancer trials registered in the registration data bases searched for this work.Conclusion There are differences in access to cancer clinical trials in LMICs compared with HICs. Several factors, such as excessive cost and a lack of infrastructure and expertise, may explain these differences.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA MÉDICA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JGO.17.00226?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Disparities in Breast, Lung, and Cervical Cancer Trials Worldwide pdfa.pdf
Tamanho:
6.89 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: