Comparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorMohamad Nagibou Wadi
dc.creatorKarina Maria Salvatore de Freitas
dc.creatorDaniel Salvatore Freitas
dc.creatorRodrigo Hermont Cançado
dc.creatorRenata Cristina Gobbi de Oliveira
dc.creatorRicardo Cesar Gobbi de Oliveira
dc.creatorGuilherme Janson
dc.creatorFabricio Pinelli Valarelli
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-03T18:18:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:14:13Z
dc.date.available2023-03-03T18:18:25Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-07
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7083940
dc.identifier.issn16878728
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/50647
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Dentistry
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectMalocclusion angle class iii
dc.subjectOrthognathic surgery
dc.titleComparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage9
local.citation.spage1
local.citation.volume2020
local.description.resumoObjective. The aim of this study was to compare the profile attractiveness between orthodontic camouflage of the Class III malocclusion and the predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery evaluated by dentists and laypeople. Settings and sample population. The sample consisted of 21 patients (9 male; 12 female) with Class III malocclusion treated with orthodontic camouflage and Class III intermaxillary elastics. Material and Methods. The mean initial age of the patients was 24.38 years (SD 3.32), and the mean ANB angle was −1.91° (SD 0.83°). Patients presented skeletal Class III and normal growth patterns. Initial and final lateral cephalograms of each patient were used. The initial cephalogram was used to perform the treatment simulation of orthognathic surgery, and its silhouette was compared to the silhouette obtained from the final cephalogram after Class III orthodontic camouflage. A subjective analysis of profile attractiveness was performed by 47 laypeople and 60 dentists, with scores from 1 (less attractive) to 10 (most attractive). Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare profile attractiveness between the orthodontic treatment and the predictive tracing groups and between dentists and laypeople. Results. The predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery showed to be statistically significantly more attractive (mean score 4.57, SD 2.47) than that of the Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment (mean score 4.22, SD 2.40), with a mean numerical but significant difference of 0.35 (SD 2.01) (). Laypeople were more critical than dentists in evaluating profile attractiveness, but numerical difference between the groups was also small. Conclusion. The profile silhouette of predictive tracing simulating orthognathic surgery showed to be more attractive than that of Class III camouflage orthodontic treatment; however, differences were small but statistically significant. Laypeople showed to be more critical than dentists.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijd/2020/7083940/

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Comparison of profile attractiveness between class iii orthodontic camouflage and predictive tracing of orthognathic surgery.pdf
Tamanho:
2.53 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG