A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic accuracy tests of COVID-19
| dc.creator | Juan Jeferson Vilca-Alosilla | |
| dc.creator | Mayron Antonio Candia-Puma | |
| dc.creator | Katiusca Coronel-Monje | |
| dc.creator | Luis Daniel Goyzueta-Mamani | |
| dc.creator | Alexsandro Sobreira Galdino | |
| dc.creator | Ricardo Andrez Machado-de-Ávila | |
| dc.creator | Rodolfo Cordeiro Giunchetti | |
| dc.creator | Eduardo Antonio Ferraz Coelho | |
| dc.creator | Miguel Angel Chávez-Fumagalli | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-10T19:31:04Z | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-08T23:17:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-10T19:31:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023-04-26 | |
| dc.format.mimetype | ||
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13091549 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4418 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1843/79829 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Diagnostics | |
| dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | |
| dc.subject | SARS-CoV-2 | |
| dc.subject | Técnicas e Procedimentos Diagnósticos | |
| dc.subject | Revisão Sistemática | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
| dc.subject.other | SARS-CoV-2 | |
| dc.subject.other | Diagnostic tests | |
| dc.subject.other | Meta-analysis | |
| dc.subject.other | Systematic review | |
| dc.subject.other | Sensitivity | |
| dc.subject.other | Specificity | |
| dc.title | A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic accuracy tests of COVID-19 | |
| dc.type | Artigo de periódico | |
| local.citation.epage | 30 | |
| local.citation.issue | 9 | |
| local.citation.spage | 01 | |
| local.citation.volume | 13 | |
| local.description.resumo | In this paper, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to evaluate the reliability of coronavirus disease diagnostic tests in 2019 (COVID-19). This article seeks to describe the scientific discoveries made because of diagnostic tests conducted in recent years during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. Between 2020 and 2021, searches for published papers on the COVID-19 diagnostic were made in the PubMed database. Ninety-nine scientific articles that satisfied the requirements were analyzed and included in the meta-analysis, and the specificity and sensitivity of the diagnostic accuracy were assessed. When compared to serological tests such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), and chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA), molecular tests such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) performed better in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Additionally, the area under the curve restricted to the false-positive rates (AUCFPR) of 0.984 obtained by the antiviral neutralization bioassay (ANB) diagnostic test revealed significant potential for the identification of COVID-19. It has been established that the various diagnostic tests have been effectively adapted for the detection of SARS-CoV-2; nevertheless, their performance still must be enhanced to contain potential COVID-19 outbreaks, which will also help contain potential infectious agent outbreaks in the future. | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4156-0237 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6328-3840 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-8715 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0308-1160 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-3030 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-0490 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4181-7546 | |
| local.identifier.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8394-4802 | |
| local.publisher.country | Brasil | |
| local.publisher.department | ICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE MORFOLOGIA | |
| local.publisher.initials | UFMG | |
| local.url.externa | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/13/9/1549 |
Arquivos
Pacote original
1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
- Nome:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic accuracy tests of COVID-19.pdf
- Tamanho:
- 8.11 MB
- Formato:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
Licença do pacote
1 - 1 de 1