Effectiveness of diode laser and fluoride on dentin hypersensitivity treatment: a randomized single blinded clinical trial

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorErika Silva Pantuzzo
dc.creatorFabiano Araújo Cunha
dc.creatorLucas Guimarães Abreu
dc.creatorRafael Paschoal Esteves Lima
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T21:57:09Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:53:14Z
dc.date.available2024-03-11T21:57:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-04
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4103%2Fjisp.jisp_478_19
dc.identifier.issn0975-1580
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/65682
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of indian society of periodontology
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectFluorine
dc.subjectLasers
dc.subjectDentin Sensitivity
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subjectPain
dc.subject.otherJournal of indian society of periodontology
dc.titleEffectiveness of diode laser and fluoride on dentin hypersensitivity treatment: a randomized single blinded clinical trial
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage263
local.citation.issue3
local.citation.spage259
local.citation.volume24
local.description.resumoAbstract: Background: This randomized single‑blinded clinical trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of diode laser and fluoride in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) due to gingival recession. Materials and Methods: Twenty‑eight individuals randomly distributed across three groups participated: 10 individuals who were treated with diode laser, nine who were treated with fluoride, and nine who received placebo. Pain was assessed with the Visual analog scale (VAS). Evaporative stimulus and tactile stimulus were evaluated with the verbal rating scale (VRS). VAS was applied shortly after, 6 h after, 12 h after, and 24 h after the single‑session treatment for DH, whereas VRS was applied shortly after, 15 min and 7 days after the treatment. Participants’ quality of life was assessed with the validated Brazilian version of the Dentine Hypersensitivity Experience Questionnaire assessing functional limitations, coping behaviors, emotional, and social impacts caused by DH. Descriptive statistics and the ANOVA test were used. Values of P < 0.05 were statistically significant. Results: Diode laser significantly reduced the DH to the evaporative stimulus (P = 0.002). The application of fluoride did not change the degree of DH to evaporative and tactile stimuli (P > 0.05). The group of individuals who were treated with diode laser presented a higher reduction in DH (25.4%) when compared to the group of individuals treated with fluoride (17.1%), and the group of individuals among whom placebo had been used (2.9%). Descriptive analysis indicated that the items measuring the emotional and social impacts of DH were those with a more negative impact on the individuals. Conclusion: Therapy with diode laser was more effective in reducing DH than therapy with fluoride.
local.identifier.orcids
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://journals.lww.com/jisp/toc/2020/24030

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Effectiveness of diode laser and fluoride on dentin hypersensitivity treatment a randomized single-blinded clinical trial.pdf
Tamanho:
483.08 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG