Can eye fixation during the grooved pegboard test distinguish between planning and online correction?

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorMaicon Rodrigues Albuquerque
dc.creatorLeandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz
dc.creatorMarco Aurélio Romano-Silva
dc.creatorJonas Jardim de Paula
dc.creatorMaila de Castro Neves
dc.creatorGuilherme Menezes Lage
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-01T20:48:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:20:34Z
dc.date.available2024-08-01T20:48:38Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0031512516685000
dc.identifier.issn0031-5125
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/72268
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofPerceptual and Motor Skills
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectOlhos
dc.subjectCapacidade motora
dc.subjectAprendizagem motora
dc.subject.otherControle motor
dc.subject.otherFoco da atenção
dc.titleCan eye fixation during the grooved pegboard test distinguish between planning and online correction?
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage392
local.citation.issue2
local.citation.spage380
local.citation.volume124
local.description.resumoThe Grooved Pegboard Test, in its standard use, has well-documented utility. However, a revised methodology needs further study, leading us to investigate whether duration of eye fixation could predict performance on different task conditions of the Grooved Pegboard Test (place and remove pegs) with the preferred and nonpreferred hands. Fifty-two right-handed undergraduate students (33 male and 19 female), with a mean age of 22.22 (±3.57) years, performed the Grooved Pegboard Test. SensoMotoric eye-tracking glasses with a binocular time resolution of 30 Hz were used to measure eye fixation. The videos were recorded in iView software, and data were analyzed using BeGaze software. The number and duration of eye fixations were statistically different with preferred and nonpreferred hands and also differed across tasks. Simple linear regression showed eye fixation duration to predict movement time in the place task (preferred hand: R2 = 31%; nonpreferred hand: R2 = 41%) and in the remove task (preferred hand: R2 = 11%; nonpreferred hand: R2 = 25%). Thus, duration of eye fixation during the Grooved Pegboard Test differentially predicted performance with each hand and on preferred and different subtests of this instrument.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE EDUCAÇÃO FÍSICA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epub/10.1177/0031512516685000

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG