Dimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3d printing

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorAnna Gabriella Camacho Presotto
dc.creatorValentim Adelino Ricardo Barão
dc.creatorCláudia Lopes Brilhante Bhering
dc.creatorMarcelo Ferraz Mesquita
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T17:45:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:02:31Z
dc.date.available2022-09-24T17:45:47Z
dc.date.issued2019-07
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.019
dc.identifier.issn00223913
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/45449
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectDenture partial fixed
dc.subjectDental Implants
dc.titleDimensional precision of implant-supported frameworks fabricated by 3d printing
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage45
local.citation.issue1
local.citation.spage38
local.citation.volume122
local.description.resumoStatement of problem. Selective laser melting (SLM) is a promising additive technology for clinical practice, but data on dimensional precision assessed by marginal fit combined with stress and strain investigations of implant-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) are lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to verify whether the SLM additive manufacturing technology provides better dimensional precision for 3-unit FPD frameworks than subtractive manufacturing with soft metal block (SMB) milling and the standard casting technique. Material and methods. Thirty 3-unit implant-supported FPDs with Co-Cr frameworks were made by the casting, SMB milling, and SLM methods (n=10). The marginal fit between the framework and the implant abutment was evaluated with photoelastic (PH) and strain gauge (SG) models. Stress and strain in the implant-supported system were measured by quantitative PH and SG analyses after prosthetic screw tightening. Data were subjected to the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann- Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation test (a=.05). Results. The framework manufacturing method affected the marginal fit (P<.001), stress, and strain values (P<.05). The SLM group showed the best mean ±standard deviation marginal fit (mm) (PH model: 8.4 ±3.2; SG model: 6.9 ±2.1) in comparison with SMB milling (PH model: 42.3 ±15.7; SG model: 41.3 ±15.3) and casting (PH model: 43.5 ±27.8; SG model: 41.3 ±24.6) (P<.05). SLM showed lower mean ±standard deviation stress and strain values (60.3 ±11.6 MPa; 91.4 ±11.1 mstrain) than casting (225.5 ±142.8 MPa; 226.95 ±55.4 mstrain) and SMB milling (218.6 ±101.7 MPa; 289.7 ±89.3 mstrain) (P<.05). A positive correlation was observed between fit and stress or strain for all groups (P<.05). Conclusions. Three-unit FPD frameworks made using the SLM technology showed better dimensional precision than those obtained with the casting or SMB milling methods
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391319300988

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG