Calcifying odontogenic cyst, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: a systematic review

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorJosé Alcides Almeida de Arruda
dc.creatorJoão Luiz Gomes Carneiro Monteiro
dc.creatorLucas Guimarães Abreu
dc.creatorLeni Verônica de Oliveira Silva
dc.creatorLauren Frenzel Schuch
dc.creatorMariana Saturnino de Noronha
dc.creatorGerhilde Callou
dc.creatorAmália Moreno
dc.creatorRicardo Alves Mesquita
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-09T14:55:28Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:29:33Z
dc.date.available2023-07-09T14:55:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12727
dc.identifier.issn09042512
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/55972
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectWounds and injuries
dc.subjectOdontogenic cyst, calcifying
dc.subjectNeoplasms
dc.titleCalcifying odontogenic cyst, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma: a systematic review
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage730
local.citation.issue8
local.citation.spage721
local.citation.volume47
local.description.resumoBackground: The aim of this study was to integrate the available data published on calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT), and ghost cell odontogenic carcinomas (GCOCs) into a comprehensive analysis of their clinicoradiological features, treatment, and recurrence. Materials and methods: An electronic search with no publication date restriction was undertaken in October 2017 in the following databases: PubMed, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, and Scopus. Eligibility criteria included publications containing enough clinical, radiological, and histopathological information to confirm a definite diagnosis of these lesions. Data were evaluated descriptively. Results: The literature review indicated a total of 234 publications reporting 367 COCs, 55 DGCTs and 44 GCOCs. These lesions have a predilection for Asian males. COCs mainly affect the mandible and patients in the second decade of life, DGCTs mostly affect the mandible and patients in the fourth decade of life, and GCOCs mostly affect the maxilla and patients in the fifth decade of life. Conclusion: Conservative surgery was the most common therapy for COCs and DGCTs, while radical surgery was most common for GCOCs. This study provides important and interesting data that could help clinicians and surgeons as well as oral and maxillofacial pathologists with the diagnosis and management of these lesions.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.12727

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG