Impact of patient characteristics on edentulous subjects' preferences for prosthodontic rehabilitation with implants

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorCláudio Rodrigues Leles
dc.creatorDanilo Rocha Dias
dc.creatorTúlio Eduardo Nogueira
dc.creatorGerald Mckenna
dc.creatorMartin Schimmel
dc.creatorLidia Moraes Ribeiro Jordão
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T18:40:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:00:39Z
dc.date.available2022-09-24T18:40:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-10
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/clr.13414
dc.identifier.issn09057161
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/45458
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectDenture complete
dc.subjectDental prosthesis implant-supported
dc.subjectPatient preference
dc.subjectQuality of life
dc.subject.otherComplete denture
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherImplant supported denture
dc.subject.otherOverdenture
dc.subject.otherPatient preference
dc.titleImpact of patient characteristics on edentulous subjects' preferences for prosthodontic rehabilitation with implants
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage292
local.citation.spage285
local.citation.volume30
local.description.resumoObjective The aim of this study was to assess the influence of patient characteristics on edentulous subjects’ preferences for different prosthodontic treatments with implants. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was carried out with 131 edentulous subjects referred for treatment at a university clinic. Participants received detailed information about available treatment options and were asked to rank their preferences among three alternatives for rehabilitation of the maxilla and mandible: conventional dentures (CD), 2-implant-retained overdentures (IOD), or 4-implant fixed dentures (IFD). Individual data and prosthodontic-related variables were assessed through interviews. Oral health-related quality of life impacts was measured using the Brazilian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile for edentulous subjects (OHIP-Edent). Descriptive statistics, bivariate tests, and binary and multinomial logistic regressions were used for data analysis. Results The majority of participants chose CD as their most preferred treatment for the maxilla (45.8%), while IFD was the most prevalent choice for the mandible (38.9%). Regression analysis showed that the OHIP-Edent “oral pain and dysfunction” (OPD) domain scores were positively associated with IOD preference for the maxilla (OR = 1.31; p = 0.010) and mandible (OR = 1.46; p = 0.002) and with IFD preference for the mandible (OR = 1.20; p = 0.031). Subjects with lower levels of formal education and those with lower income levels were less likely to choose IFD. Conclusion Level of education, income, and perceived quality of life impacts are potentially predictive variables of edentulous patients’ preference for rehabilitation with implants. These factors may constitute important aspects to be considered by clinicians when treatment planning for edentulous patients
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.13414

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG