Viability of bovine teeth as a substrate in bond strength tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorMonize Ferreira de Figueiredo
dc.creatorAmanda Carolina Neiva Leijôto Lannes
dc.creatorMarcela Carolina Nunes Rodrigues
dc.creatorLilian Capanema Nogueira
dc.creatorNayara Kelly Lyrio Ferraz
dc.creatorAllysson Nogueira Moreira
dc.creatorMônica Yamauti
dc.creatorLívia Guimarães Zina
dc.creatorClaúdia Silami de Magalhães
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T18:03:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:51:02Z
dc.date.available2022-09-24T18:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-28
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.jad.a41636
dc.identifier.issn17579988
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/45450
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Adhesive Dentristry
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectDental enamel
dc.subjectReview
dc.subject.otherbond strength
dc.subject.otherBovine tooth
dc.subject.otherDentin
dc.subject.otherEnamel
dc.subject.otherHuman tooth
dc.titleViability of bovine teeth as a substrate in bond strength tests: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage479
local.citation.issue6
local.citation.spage471
local.citation.volume20
local.description.resumoPurpose: To assess whether bovine teeth can be used as viable alternatives for human teeth in tensile and shear bond strength testing. Materials and Methods: Articles were selected from Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, LILACS-Bireme, and BBO electronic databases using keywords obtained from Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Of 1540 potentially eligible studies, 157 were selected for full text analysis. Five independent reviewers (Kappa = 0.89) selected the studies, abstracted information, and assessed quality based on standardized scales. After the analysis, 78 studies comparing bovine teeth to human teeth were found. Only 18 studies comparing bovine and human substrates in bond strength tests were included in the systematic review and 13 in the meta-analysis. Two authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias. Mean differences were obtained by comparing tensile and shear bond strengths between human and bovine teeth (permanent and deciduous) and considering enamel and dentin separately (subgroup analysis). Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan5.1, with a random-effect model, at a 5% significance level. Results: No significant difference was found between human and bovine teeth in tensile tests (p = 0.41) for dentin (p = 0.86), but there was a difference for enamel (p = 0.01). Regarding shear bond strength, no significant difference was found between human and bovine teeth (p = 0.16) either for enamel (p = 0.07) or dentin (p = 0.68). Regarding shear bond strength on deciduous teeth, no significant difference was found between human and bovine substrates (p = 0.54), either for enamel (p = 0.42) or dentin (p = 0.05). Most studies were at high (low or unclear) risk of bias. Conclusions: In shear bond strength testing, bovine teeth can be a suitable alternative for permanent and deciduous human teeth, for both enamel and dentin substrates. However, they may not be suitable for enamel tensile bond strength testing. The findings are based on low quality studies (considerable heterogeneity) and should be interpreted with caution
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA RESTAURADORA
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOLOGIA SOCIAL E PREVENTIVA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.quintessence-publishing.com/deu/en/article/843441

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG