Are functional mobility tests responsive to group physical therapy intervention in individuals with Parkinson’s disease?

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorGessyca Spagnuolo
dc.creatorChristina Danielli Coelho de Morais Faria
dc.creatorBruna Adriana da Silva
dc.creatorAngélica Cristiane Ovando
dc.creatorJoyce Gomes-Osman
dc.creatorAlessandra Swarowsky
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T18:22:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:07:28Z
dc.date.available2022-12-22T18:22:13Z
dc.date.issued2018-06
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-172379
dc.identifier.issn1053-8135
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/48384
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroRehabilitation
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectDoença de Parkinson
dc.subjectMovimento
dc.subjectFisioterapia
dc.subjectTestes
dc.subject.otherParkinson disease
dc.subject.otherMobility
dc.subject.otherResponsiveness
dc.subject.otherPhysiotherapy
dc.titleAre functional mobility tests responsive to group physical therapy intervention in individuals with Parkinson’s disease?
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage472
local.citation.issue4
local.citation.spage465
local.citation.volume42
local.description.resumoAbstract: BACKGROUND:The Timed up and go test (TUG), the Five times sit-to-stand test (FTSTS) and the Bed Mobility test (BMT) are widely used in clinical practice for Parkinson Disease (PD). However, no reported studies have evaluated the responsiveness to group physical therapy intervention (GPTI). OBJECTIVE:To verify if TUG, FTSTS and BMT were responsive to GPTI. METHODS:Thirty individuals with PD were assessed prior to and after an 8-week evidence-based GPTI. Paired t test was used to determine statistically significant change pre-and post-intervention. Internal responsiveness (IR) was classified with the standardized response mean (SRM). A 5-point Likert scale assessed self-perceived performance by the subjects after the intervention. Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the accuracy and cut-off scores for identifying participants who had shown improvement. RESULTS:GPTI was efficient in improving real (p≤0.001) and self-perceived mobility performance in all measures. All tests were responsive to changes: the IR varied from medium to high (SRM = 0.7–1.5); the cut-off point for TUG test was >2.2 s, for FTSTS test was >2.5 s and for BM test >1.4 s. CONCLUSIONS:The TUG, FTSTS and BMT were responsive to the GPTI and accurately detected meaningful clinical changes. Our results provide an important information about the clinical application of these tests in PD individuals.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9784-9729
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-3258
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-0208
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://content.iospress.com/articles/neurorehabilitation/nre172379

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG