Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorPatrícia Pauletto
dc.creatorHelena Polmann
dc.creatorJéssica Conti Réus
dc.creatorJúlia Meller Dias de Oliveira
dc.creatorDébora Chaves
dc.creatorKaryn Lehmkuhl
dc.creatorCarla Massignan
dc.creatorCristine Miron Stefani
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martins
dc.creatorCarlos Flores-Mir
dc.creatorGraziela de Luca Canto
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T18:53:21Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T01:22:27Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T18:53:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-14
dc.description.sponsorshipOutra Agência
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-022-0802-5
dc.identifier.issn1476-5446
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/68087
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofevidence-based dentistry
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectClinical decision-making
dc.subjectHealth policy
dc.subjectHealth evaluation
dc.subject.otherSystematic reviews
dc.subject.otherClinical decision-making
dc.subject.otherHealth policy
dc.subject.otherAMSTAR 2
dc.subject.otherMethodological quality
dc.titleCritical appraisal of systematic reviews of intervention in dentistry published between 2019-2020 using the AMSTAR 2 tool
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage8
local.citation.spage1
local.description.resumoIntroduction: The number of systematic reviews (SRs) in dentistry published each year has grown considerably, and they have been essential in clinical decision-making and health policy. Objective: The objective is to critically appraise SRs of intervention in dentistry using the 'A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2' (AMSTAR 2) tool published within one year. Methods A search in the Medline/PubMed database was performed. The SRs were identified in two phases. The first phase identified SRs of interventions in dentistry by title and abstract. In the second phase, the full text was read, applying the eligibility criteria. Three calibrated reviewers methodologically assessed all SRs identified using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Data were analysed descriptively, and SRs were grouped according to methodological quality as moderate/high and low/critically low. A logistic regression model was applied to explore the associations between methodological quality and the study's characteristics. Results: Two hundred and twenty-two SRs were included. The methodological quality of the SRs included in this study were: critically low (56.8%), low (27.9%), moderate (14.4%) and high (0.9%), according to AMSTAR 2. There were no statistical differences between moderate/high and low/critically low methodological quality and publication year, continent, journal Impact Factor and dental speciality. Conclusion: Less than 1% of recently published SRs in dentistry were classified with high methodological quality. We hope that this study will alert researchers about the need to improve the methodological quality of SRs.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41432-022-0802-5

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG