A potential new oral mapping (OM) method in the clinical evaluation and documentation of oral submucous fibrosis a prospective clinical crossover study

dc.creatorGururaj Arakeri
dc.creatorPeter A Brennan
dc.creatorAbdulsalam Aljabab
dc.creatorNagaraj Maddur
dc.creatorSantosh Hunasgi
dc.creatorShekar Patil
dc.creatorBeverly Hale
dc.creatorMatthias A. W. Merkx
dc.creatorCarolina Cavaliéri Gomes
dc.creatorRicardo Santiago Gomez
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-18T20:15:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:00:39Z
dc.date.available2025-08-18T20:15:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-04
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12821
dc.identifier.issn1600-0714
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/84408
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectOral submucous fibrosis
dc.subjectEvaluation study
dc.subject.otherOral mapping method
dc.subject.otherOral submucous fibrosis;
dc.subject.otherOral submucous fibrosis database
dc.subject.otherOral submucous fibrosis documentation
dc.titleA potential new oral mapping (OM) method in the clinical evaluation and documentation of oral submucous fibrosis a prospective clinical crossover study
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage320
local.citation.issue4
local.citation.spage315
local.citation.volume48
local.description.resumoBackground: Despite much research, there is a lack of a definite protocol or method for documenting oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) site presentation. In this study, we propose a new potential oral mapping (OM) method and evaluated its use in recording OSMF-affected mucosal sites. Methods: Fifty OSMF patients were evaluated by 15 primary care dental practitioners using both, a conventional subjective recording method and a new OM method, to document the degree of involvement of affected oral mucosa with a crossover study design. Mann-Whitney test (non-parametric test) was used to make comparison between groups to determine any significant differences between the two identification methods. Wilcoxon tests were used to evaluate any significant differences in the difficulty in identification of two methods. Results: There was a low agreement between the two methods used to detect OSMF in affected mucosal surfaces (P-value < 0.0001). More lesions were identified using the proposed OM method, and less discrepancy was found among dental practitioners. A difference in difficulty of OSMF documentation was found (Wilcoxon z = 3.615, P-value < 0.001), with the proposed OM method found to be easier. Conclusion: The proposed OM method appears to be useful for documentation, can easily be adapted in clinical practice, and effectively administered in clinical research. Additionally, it could be a useful tool to helping to maintain an OSMF database.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2032-4526
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-8719
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-0103-0236
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0687-9760
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-4995
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-8009
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE CLÍNICA
local.publisher.departmentICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE MORFOLOGIA
local.publisher.departmentICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE PATOLOGIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jop.12821

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: