Different types of mechanical vibration application on EMG response and strength performance

dc.creatorAler Ribeiro Almeida
dc.creatorMarcos Daniel Motta Drummond
dc.creatorLeszek Antony Szmuchrowski
dc.creatorGustavo Ferreira Pedrosa
dc.creatorBruno Pena Couto
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-01T17:11:18Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:08:09Z
dc.date.available2024-03-01T17:11:18Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-657420220009221
dc.identifier.issn1980-6574
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/65095
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofMotriz
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectFusos musculares
dc.subjectEletromiografia
dc.subjectTreinamento de Força
dc.subject.otherMuscle spindle
dc.subject.otherElectromyography
dc.subject.otherStrength training
dc.subject.otherOne maximum repetition test
dc.titleDifferent types of mechanical vibration application on EMG response and strength performance
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.volume28
local.description.resumoAim: The present study aimed to compare the strength performance and the neuromuscular activity during one maximum repetition test (1RM), and the maximum voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) performed with whole-body vibration (WBV), local vibration (LV), and no vibration (NV). Methods: The sample consisted of 15 males, experienced in strength training for at least 6 months, which performed all strength tests in the barbell curl exercise across randomized trials on the following conditions: NV, WBV, and LV. During all tests, the normalized root means square values of the electromyographic signals (EMGRMS) of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis were recorded and compared between the conditions. The one-way ANOVAs with repeated measures were used to compare the results of 1RM and MVIC tests and the normalized EMGRMS between the conditions. When necessary, a post hoc ScottKnott test was used to identify the differences reported in the ANOVAs. The significance level adopted was α < 0.05. Results: The EMGRMS response of the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles during the 1RM and MVIC tests presented significantly higher values at LV compared to WBV, and NV (p < 0.001). The 1RM tests, and the MVIC results were similar between conditions (p = 0.9803; p = 0.061, respectively). Conclusion: These results indicate that the application of MV was not sufficient to increase strength performance.
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-0780-2060
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-1297
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-4226
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-9928-4124
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-1011-6405
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE ESPORTES
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/motriz/a/K58hC85PpJmCkrPxDHBKjLz/?lang=en#

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Different types of mechanical vibration application on EMG response and strength performance.pdf
Tamanho:
18.01 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: