Relationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: a systematic review

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorFrederico Santos Lages
dc.creatorDhelfeson Willya Douglas de Oliveira
dc.creatorFernando Oliveira Costa
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-11T19:20:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:08:06Z
dc.date.available2022-10-11T19:20:24Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12565
dc.identifier.issn15230899
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/46162
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.subjectTorque
dc.subjectResonance frequency analysis
dc.subject.otherDental implant
dc.subject.otherOsseointegration
dc.subject.otherOsstel
dc.subject.otherTorque
dc.titleRelationship between implant stability measurements obtained by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis: a systematic review
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage33
local.citation.issue01
local.citation.spage26
local.citation.volume20
local.description.resumoBackground: The primary stability of dental implants can be evaluated by insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Objective: Assess the supposed relationship between the IT and RFA. Materials and methods: A systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA. The electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library electronic, OVID, and Scielo databases. Manual searches were also performed. There was no restrictions regarding year of publication or language. The articles identified were assessed independently by 3 trained researchers. Clinical trials reporting the RFA values by means of implant stability quotient (ISQ) and IT were included. Results: The electronic and manual searches yielded 2017 studies. Twelve studies were included in the systematic review. There was no statistically significant correlation between ISQ and IT (rs = .366; P = .079). The quality of the evidence was downgraded by risk of bias and indirectness; and the certainty of the evidence was low. Conclusion: IT and RFA are independent and incomparable methods of measuring primary stability. Is important for clinicians to define only one method of evaluation for each implant
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.12565

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG