A review on respiratory muscle training devices

dc.creatorKênia Kiefer Parreiras de Menezes
dc.creatorLucas Rodrigues do Nascimento
dc.creatorPatrick Roberto Avelino
dc.creatorJanaíne Cunha Polese
dc.creatorLuci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-25T18:40:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:26:46Z
dc.date.available2022-11-25T18:40:46Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4172/2161-105X.1000451
dc.identifier.issn2161-105X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/47466
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectMúsculos respiratórios
dc.subjectTreinamento
dc.subjectExercícios respiratórios
dc.subjectReabilitação
dc.subject.otherRespiratory muscles
dc.subject.otherResistance training
dc.subject.otherBreathing exercises
dc.subject.otherRehabilitation
dc.titleA review on respiratory muscle training devices
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage7
local.citation.issue2
local.citation.spage1
local.citation.volume8
local.description.resumoBackground and aim: There are currently many devices on the market, which have been used for training of the respiratory muscles. The knowledge of these devices may help professionals to carefully select the best one to be used. However, due to the numerous available devices available, this selection represents a challenge. Although previous studies have attempted to describe all respiratory muscle training devices, important ones with proven efficacy were not included. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to describe the mechanisms and characteristics of all available respiratory muscle training devices, and discuss their merits and limitations. Methods: Searches were conducted in databases, books, website selling products related to rehabilitation, and reference lists of the retrieved papers. Results: The present review included 14 devices currently available on the market and reported by published studies. However, three could not be described in details, due to lack of information. Amongst the 11 evaluated devices, all of them showed positive aspects and limitations that should be considered. Conclusion: Although some devices appear to be more advantageous than others, it is not possible to choose the best one, based only upon their technical information and clinical utility. To select the most appropriate one, it is also necessary to consider the specific health condition, the nature of the impairments, the purpose of the training, and whether it is for use within research or clinical contexts.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9906-9555
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6792-0819
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7248-4767
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-3366-1545
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8358-8636
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/a-review-on-respiratory-muscle-training-devices-2161-105X-1000451.pdf

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
A review on respiratory muscle training devices.pdf
Tamanho:
224.25 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: