Evaluation of short and regular implants after prosthesis placement in the mandible: a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorRafael Scaf de Molon
dc.creatorFrederico Santos Lages
dc.creatorCarolina Poquechoque Rivera
dc.creatorAna Paula de Souza Faloni
dc.creatorRogerio Margonar
dc.creatorThallita Pereira Queiroz
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T19:53:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:40:09Z
dc.date.available2022-10-06T19:53:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-01
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2187
dc.identifier.issn15263711
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/46055
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectAlveolar bone loss
dc.subjectBone resorption
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectDental prosthesis
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone loss
dc.subject.otherBone resorption
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherDental prosthesis
dc.subject.otherImplant supported
dc.titleEvaluation of short and regular implants after prosthesis placement in the mandible: a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage1129
local.citation.issue12
local.citation.spage1122
local.citation.volume18
local.description.resumoAim: The aim of this nonrandomized controlled preliminary clinical trial was to compare treatment using short and conventional implants in the posterior region of the mandible after prosthesis installation by means of clinical, resonance frequency, and radiographic analyses. Materials and methods: A total of 10 patients with 40 dental implants already installed were included in this study. Four implants were installed for each subject, in which the length of the implants (short and conventional) was distributed according to the reminiscent alveolar bone in the left and right side of the mandible. All implants received splinted prosthesis after the osseointegration period. Analyses were performed immediately after prosthesis installation (T1), and 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after prosthesis placement. Results: The 6-month survival and success rates were 100% for the short and conventional implants. Probing depths (PDs) after 6 months did not show statistical differences between short and conventional implants. All groups showed mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values above 60 in all periods evaluated, demonstrating great implant stability, and no differences were found between groups at T3. Radiographic measurements showed an increased bone loss for conventional implants compared with short implants in all the three periods evaluated. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that treatment of resorbed posterior regions in the mandible with shorter dental implants is as reliable as treatment with conventional implants after 6 months of splinted prosthesis installation. Clinical significance: Short implants might be considered a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation or extensive surgical techniques in regions of restricted vertical bone height in the posterior region of the mandible
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.thejcdp.com/abstractArticleContentBrowse/JCDP/19/18/12/3872/abstractArticle/Article

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Evaluation of short and regular implants after prosthesis placement in the mandible a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial.pdf
Tamanho:
305.02 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG