Reply to biodiversity conservation gaps in Brazil: a role for systematic conservation planning

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorUbirajara Oliveira
dc.creatorJoão Paulo Peixoto Pena Barbosa
dc.creatorJoão Renato Stehmann
dc.creatorJohn S. Ascher
dc.creatorMarcelo Ferreira de Vasconcelos
dc.creatorPaulo de Marco
dc.creatorPeter Löwenberg-neto
dc.creatorViviane Gianluppi Ferro
dc.creatorAdalberto J. Santos
dc.creatorBritaldo Silveira Soares Filho
dc.creatorAdriano Pereira Paglia
dc.creatorAntonio D. Brescovit
dc.creatorClaudio J. B. de Carvalho
dc.creatorDaniel Paiva Silva
dc.creatorDaniella T. Rezende
dc.creatorFelipe Sá Fortes Leite
dc.creatorJoão Aguiar Nogueira Batista
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-18T21:30:25Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:24:17Z
dc.date.available2023-04-18T21:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.05.001
dc.identifier.issn2530-0644
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/52203
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofPerspectives in Ecology and Conservation
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectEcologia
dc.subjectBiodiversidade - Conservação
dc.subjectBrasil
dc.subject.otherBiodiveristy
dc.subject.otherBrazil
dc.subject.otherConservation strategies
dc.titleReply to biodiversity conservation gaps in Brazil: a role for systematic conservation planning
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage167
local.citation.issue3
local.citation.spage166
local.citation.volume16
local.description.resumoFonseca and Venticinque (2018) (hereafter FV) present a critical assessment of a paper in which we attempt to estimate the biodiversity coverage of the Brazilian conservation units (Oliveira et al., 2017). We appreciate their contribution to this important debate. We have no doubts that conservation planning should be based on a variety of information sources, including not only the coverage of species’ ranges but also the contribution of each area to the preservation of ecosystem services, landscape features and socioeconomic and cultural aspects. This systematic and integrative conservation planning is certainly a complex process, which requires the contribution of experts from different fields. However, we have shown, in this reply, that our paper (Oliveira et al., 2017) aims to quantify the knowledge and protection gaps of biodiversity in protected areas, not to propose priority areas or to test whether the current proposal of priority areas is efficient. Objectives and the conclusions of our paper. We hope this short response can clarify this debate.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4877-5414
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9504-5441
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7887-2461
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-8198
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-6405
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5122-0247
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6491-806X
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-946X
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-5506
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1511-5324
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-4336
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4561-5634
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-0942
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE BOTÂNICA
local.publisher.departmentICB - DEPARTAMENTO DE ZOOLOGIA
local.publisher.departmentIGC - DEPARTAMENTO DE CARTOGRAFIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064418300403?via%3Dihub

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
replytobiodiversityconservation.pdf
Tamanho:
133.1 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG