Hybrid treatment with complete transposition of supra-aortic trunks versus conventional surgery for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysm

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorLeonardo de Oliveira Souza
dc.creatorRodrigo de Castro Bernardes
dc.creatorTúlio Pinho Navarro
dc.creatorRicardo Jayme Procópio
dc.creatorFernando Antônio Roquete Reis Filho
dc.creatorLuiz Claudio Moreira Lima
dc.creatorErnesto Lentz da Silveira
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T21:47:59Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:35:19Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T21:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0052
dc.identifier.issn0102-7638
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/56545
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofBrazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectAneurisma Aórtico
dc.subjectAorta
dc.subjectProcedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardiovasculares
dc.subjectProcedimentos Endovasculares
dc.subject.otherAortic Aneurysm
dc.subject.otherAorta
dc.subject.otherThoracic
dc.subject.otherCardiovascular Surgical Procedures
dc.subject.otherEndovascular Procedures
dc.titleHybrid treatment with complete transposition of supra-aortic trunks versus conventional surgery for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysm
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage360
local.citation.issue5
local.citation.spage354
local.citation.volume32
local.description.resumoObjective: The disease of the aortic arch is traditionally approached by open surgical repair requiring cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. This study performed a retrospective analysis comparing outcomes through primary hybrid patients submitted to aortic arch surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass with patients submitted to conventional open surgery. Methods: 25 patients submitted to the aortic arch surgery were selected in the period 2003-2012 at the Madre Teresa Hospital in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil; 13 of these underwent hybrid technique without cardiopulmonary bypass and 12 underwent conventional open surgery. Results: The mortality rate for the hybrid group was 23% and for the conventional surgery group was 17% (P=0.248). The postoperative complication rate was also similar in both groups, with no significant difference. Conclusion: Both techniques proved to be similar in mortality and morbidity. However, due to the small sample, more analytical studies with larger samples and long-term follow-up are needed to clarify this issue.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-5825
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE CIRURGIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rbccv/a/KKP33hsKJ7PWWCn7J4jDb8S/?lang=en

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Hybrid Treatment with Complete Transposition of Supra-Aortic Trunks versus Conventional Surgery for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Aneurysm.pdf
Tamanho:
108.68 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG