Case presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus snapps in a controlled setting

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorEleonora d. T.fagundes
dc.creatorCássio c. Ibiapina
dc.creatorCristina g. Alvim
dc.creatorRachel Aparecida Ferreira Fernandes
dc.creatorMarco Antônio Carvalho-filho
dc.creatorPaul l. p. Brand
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-15T23:55:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:52:55Z
dc.date.available2023-06-15T23:55:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-19
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40037-020-00588-y
dc.identifier.issn22122761
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/54990
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofPerspectives on Medical Education
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectRaciocínio Clínico
dc.subjectRelatos de Casos
dc.subject.otherSNAPPS
dc.subject.otherOne-minute preceptor
dc.subject.otherCase presentation
dc.subject.otherClinical reasoning
dc.titleCase presentation methods: a randomized controlled trial of the one-minute preceptor versus snapps in a controlled setting
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage250
local.citation.issue4
local.citation.spage245
local.citation.volume9
local.description.resumoIntroduction One-minute preceptor (OMP) andSNAPPS (a mnemonic for Summarize history andfindings; Narrow the differential; Analyze the differential; Probe the preceptor about uncertainties; Plan management; and Select case-related issues for self study) are educational techniques developed to pro mote learners’ expression of clinical reasoning duringthe case presentation in the workplace. The aim ofthis present study was to compare the content of thecase presentation between the SNAPPS and the OMP methods.Methods This was a randomized controlled trial com paring SNAPPS and OMP in 60 medical students at the beginning of their fifth year of medical school. After an introduction session, students presented anddiscussed two cases based on real patients and provided in written format. All case presentations were recorded and evaluated by two researchers. The assessed elements of the case presentations were di vided into three subgroups related to expression of clinical reasoning, time and initiative to guide the presentation.Results There were 30 participants in each group.There was no difference in the expression of clinical reasoning between OMP and SNAPPS groups (num ber of differential diagnoses, justification of most likely diagnosis and differential diagnosis, expression of comparing and contrasting hypotheses). However, students in the SNAPPS group expressed significantly more questions and uncertainties (p< 0.001), and more often took the initiative to present and justifythe most likely diagnosis, differential diagnosis and management plan than students in the OMP group, both in simple and complex cases (all p values <0.001) without extending the length of the teaching session. Conclusion OMP and SNAPPS equally promote med ical students’ expression of clinical reasoning. The SNAPPS technique was more effective than the OMP technique in helping students to take on an active role during case presentation. We propose SNAPPS as an effective learning tool, engaging students and promot ing the expression of their clinical reasoning as part of a case presentation.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentMED - DEPARTAMENTO DE PEDIATRIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://pmejournal.org/articles/10.1007/S40037-020-00588-Y

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Case presentation methods a randomized controlled trial of the one minute perceptor versus SNAPPS in a controlled setting pdfa.pdf
Tamanho:
174.42 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Baixar

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG