Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015

dc.creatorAugusto Cesar Soares dos Santos Junior
dc.creatorLuíza de Oliveira Rodrigues
dc.creatorDaniela Castelo Azevedo
dc.creatorLélia Maria de Almeida Carvalho
dc.creatorMariana Ribeiro Fernandes
dc.creatorSandra de Oliveira Sapori Avelar
dc.creatorMaria da Glória Cruvinel Horta
dc.creatorSilvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-13T22:35:38Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:38:22Z
dc.date.available2024-06-13T22:35:38Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0244
dc.identifier.issn1677-6119
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/69187
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectNeoplasias da Próstata
dc.subjectNeoplasias
dc.subjectProstatectomia
dc.subjectIncontinência Urinária
dc.subject.otherUrinary Incontinence
dc.subject.otherProstatectomy
dc.subject.otherProstatic Neoplasms
dc.subject.otherUrinary Sphincter
dc.subject.otherArtificial
dc.titleArtificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage154
local.citation.issue1
local.citation.spage150
local.citation.volume43
local.description.resumoThis study aimed to retrospectively evaluate a cohort of patients with prostate cancer and persistent urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. From January 2004 to December 2015, eighty-six individuals were identified to have received an AUS implant, provided by a private nonprofit HMO operating in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. On total, there were 91 AUS implants, with a median interval between radical prostatectomy and AUS implant of 3.6 years (IQR 1.9 to 5.5). The rate of AUS cumulative survival, after a median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR 1.7-7.2 years), was 44% (n=40). The median survival of AUS implants was 2.9 years (IQR 0.5-7.9 years). Thirty-seven AUS implants (40.7%) resulted in grade III surgical complications. There were 5 deaths at 2.1, 4.7, 5.7, 5.7 and 6.5 years of follow-up, but none due to causes directly associated to the AUS implant. Persistent severe incontinence was documented in 14 (15.3%) additional patients. From the 51 AUS implants which resulted in grade III surgical complications or persistent severe incontinence, 24 (47.1%) underwent surgical revisions. Explantation of the sphincter or its components was observed in 6 cases (25.0%). Mechanical failure, described as fluid loss and/or inability to recycle the AUS device, was observed in 4 devices (16.7%). In conclusion, although AUS implants are recommended as the gold-standard treatment of severe urinary incontinence after prostatectomy, the observed high rates of malfunction and grade III adverse events are a matter of concern warranting further assessment on the safety and efficacy of these devices.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentMEDICINA - FACULDADE DE MEDICINA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.scielo.br/j/ibju/a/dbQcBJZ99QbBLg3pV9XRXHh/?lang=en

Arquivos

Pacote original

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy_ a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015.pdf
Tamanho:
174.21 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição: