Performance and reproducibility of the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a controlled cross-sectional study

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorVera Stanzani
dc.creatorAnderson José
dc.creatorCristiane Helga Yamane de Oliveira
dc.creatorJaqueline Cristina Baldorini
dc.creatorFernanda de Córdoba Lanza
dc.creatorSimone Dal Corso
dc.creatorCarla Malaguti
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-02T17:54:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T23:15:06Z
dc.date.available2023-01-02T17:54:47Z
dc.date.issued2018-09
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/1097/HCR.0000000000000323
dc.identifier.issn1932-751x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/48562
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectAtividades cotidianas
dc.subjectDoença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica
dc.subjectReprodutibilidade dos testes
dc.subject.otherActivities of daily living
dc.subject.otherChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
dc.subject.otherReproducibility
dc.titlePerformance and reproducibility of the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a controlled cross-sectional study
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage332
local.citation.issue5
local.citation.spage327
local.citation.volume38
local.description.resumoPurpose: To compare the performances of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and healthy individuals on the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance 10 (PFP10) test and, second, to test the reproducibility of the PFP10 test in these participants. Methods: In a prospective, cross-sectional study, 28 patients with COPD (67 ± 9 y, FEV1: 44.3 ± 16.9% pred) and 12 healthy volunteers (healthy group) matched by age, body mass index, and sex were included. The participants performed 2 PFP10 tests 5 d apart. Main outcome measure was performance on the PFP10 test and included total score, score for specific domains, and total time to perform the PFP10 test. Results: The functional performance of patients with COPD was worse than that of the healthy group on PFP10 total scores (43.9 ± 12.6 vs 63.5 ± 9.4, respectively; P < .001; effect size: 1.78) and time to complete the tasks (207.9 ± 36.1 sec vs 153.2 ± 12.1 sec, respectively; P < .001, effect size: 2.27). In addition, the COPD group had significantly worse performance in the domains of upper-body strength, lower-body strength, balance and coordination, and endurance. The test was highly reproducible (ICC: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99 for both groups), and the mean difference (upper and lower limits of agreement) of the total scores was −3 (−9 to 3). Conclusions: The PFP10 test is a suitable and reproducible test for determining decreases in the functional performance of patients with COPD compared with healthy individuals.
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3611-0098
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-8181
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-6947
local.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9190-6796
local.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-6619-136X
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentEEF - DEPARTAMENTO DE FISIOTERAPIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://journals.lww.com/jcrjournal/Abstract/2018/09000/Performance_and_Reproducibility_of_the_Continuous.10.aspx

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG