Influence of third molars in mandibular fractures. Part 2: mandibular condyle — a meta-analysis

Página do item simplificado
dc.creatorAnna Catharina Vieira Armond
dc.creatorCarolina de Castro Martins
dc.creatorJosé Cristiano Ramos Glória
dc.creatorEndi Lanza Galvão
dc.creatorCássio Roberto Rocha dos Santos
dc.creatorSaulo Gabriel Moreira Falci
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T18:39:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-09T00:04:27Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T18:39:27Z
dc.date.issued2017-06
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1265
dc.identifier.issn1399-0020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1843/63293
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.rightsAcesso Restrito
dc.subjectMolar, third
dc.subjectMandibular fractures
dc.subjectMandibular condyle
dc.subjectSurgery, oral
dc.subjectMeta-analysis
dc.subject.otherThird molar
dc.subject.otherCondyle fractures
dc.subject.otherOral surgery
dc.titleInfluence of third molars in mandibular fractures. Part 2: mandibular condyle — a meta-analysis
dc.typeArtigo de periódico
local.citation.epage739
local.citation.issue6
local.citation.spage730
local.citation.volume46
local.description.resumoThe aim of this systematic review was to investigate the influence of the presence and position of mandibular third molars in mandibular condyle fractures. An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and VHL, through January 2016. The eligibility criteria included observational studies. The search strategy resulted in 704 articles. Following the selection process, 13 studies were included in the systematic review and 11 in the meta-analysis. In terms of the risk of bias analysis, six studies presented ≤6 stars in the Newcastle–Ottawa scale assessment. The presence of a mandibular third molar decreased the probability of condylar fracture (cross-sectional and case–control studies: odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–0.40, I2 = 87.8%; case–control studies: OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16–0.58, I2 = 91.6%). The third molar positions most favourable to condylar fracture according to the Pell and Gregory classification are class A (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.09–1.61, I2 = 0%) and class I (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05–1.77, I2 = 32.8%). Class B (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49–0.97, I2 = 56.0%) and class II (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.87, I2 = 0%) act as protective factors for condylar fracture. The results suggest that the presence of a mandibular third molar decreases the chance of condylar fracture and that the positions of the third molar most favourable for condylar fracture are classes A and I, with classes B and II acting as protective factors.
local.publisher.countryBrasil
local.publisher.departmentFAO - DEPARTAMENTO DE ODONTOPEDIATRIA E ORTODONTIA
local.publisher.initialsUFMG
local.url.externahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502717313309

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
License.txt
Tamanho:
1.99 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descrição:
Baixar

Coleções

Artigo de Periódico

Logo UFMG